Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael.SF.
I strongly suggest that the source of that quote is wrong. In Churchill's day, “liberal” didn't mean what it does in the U.S.A. today. In fact, it still means something quite different in most of the rest of the Anglo-sphere.

U.S. leftists co-opted the word “liberal”; because they knew better than to call themselves what they actually are.

Churchill would have said “socialist” — and that's how I've always heard the quote repeated.

What's the opposite of “stand corrected”? IMHO, you were right the first time.

20 posted on 10/28/2009 6:58:26 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
What's the opposite of “stand corrected”? IMHO, you were right the first time.

In my post I put the age at 30, in my link to a version of the quote, the age is given as 40. That was what I referred to when I said I stood corrected. It is a minor point.

Thanks

23 posted on 10/28/2009 7:05:24 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Where are are we going and how did I get in this hand basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson