Posted on 11/06/2009 6:26:41 PM PST by Federalist Patriot
Here is video of Col. Ralph Peter telling Bill O'Reilly saying what happened at Fort Hood yesterday "was the worst terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11. It was committed by a Muslim fanatic who shouted "Allah is Great," and gunned down 44 unarmed innocent soldiers and civilians."
Peters also blasted Obama for not facing the facts of case, and for refusing to call it what it is.
O'Reilly told Peters it is possible the guy snapped, but that it is very possible he is a terrorist.
Peters pointed out to O'Reilly that most terrorists are not your most stable people! He said Hasan clearly planned his attack, and that this was definitely a "terrorist act."
Peters was just outstanding. He tells it like it is. America is drowning in Political Correctness that is preventing us from facing reality. . . . (VIDEO)
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...
ping
Thank you, Col. Peters, for telling it like it is. How refreshing for a change.
And as O’Reilly correctly said, that fact will only be reported by Fox. Another bump for Fox’s ratings, because everybody KNOWS this was terrorism no matter what the media tells us.
I arrived home just in time to hear him. We need more Col. Peterson’s in this country that say what they mean and mean what they say and none of this PC sugar coating crap.
OMG!! Racism!!!/s
I heard this guy and immediately applauded. He was right on the money with everything he said
Snapped? How many shots were fired? If you snap suddenly, you may have 5 to 11 shots on you, not freaking 40+ with 2 handguns.
They are reaching for the absurd explanations.
Terrorism is done for the purpose of intimidating a population to change policy or behavior of a government.
This is a kind of protest with murder. What Islam considers free speech against the inferior.
This only works against democracies for the most part, that is why you don’t see dictatorships being suicide bombed.
That sure does describe what the heck the guy did. Yes, Terrorism plain and simple.
Is it not strange that it took CIVILIAN law enforcement personnel to end an attack on a MILITARY base?
Why aren`t the USA military base personnel armed as the Israeli miitary is armed on their bases? We are both at war against the same enemy. Why don`t we use identical tactics?
When is the damn media going to discuss the fact that MAJ Mohammed used weapons and ammunition that were capable of piercing the body armor of law enforcement officials?
There is no "he was crazy/insane" argument when that damn fact is front-page news across America.
He methodically searched for powerful weapons and ammunition, because he knew the MPs and other law enforcement responders would be wearing body armor.
This was well-planned, and carefully thought out.
The origins of most terrorist attacks are also carefully planned.
I don’t care what the legacy media says, it is terrorism. Plain and simple.
Right you are. The Army dude at the presser just said that around 100 rounds were fired by the @$$#01e.
Amen to that!
Hearing Colonel Peters on XM radio tonight softened the blow of my losing at the Casino tonight.
No CCPs are honored on these facilities.
Everyone is disarmed in these "gun free" zones, and they are all basically at the mercy of the responding LEOs on base.
If CCPs were in effect at Fort Hood, the body count may have been lower just as the body count at Virginia Tech may have been lower if they honored CCPs.
“Thank you, Col. Peters, for telling it like it is. How refreshing for a change.”
Amen!
Thank God we have patriots willing to stand up and be counted.
http://www.freedomslighthouse.com/2009/11/col-ralph-peters-says-fort-hood.html
Re-broadcast for later?
OReilly. Fox News. Rebroadcast at 11:00 Eastern
You are so right! I hope after this tragedy, they will all be armed and on guard!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.