Skip to comments.Taitz demands Holder commence Quo Warranto against Obama
Posted on 12/15/2009 7:00:23 AM PST by opentalk
(Dec. 14, 2009) Without a doubt the most important and significant legal action in the United States this week, is Dr. Orly Taitzs Letter to Eric Holder, sent today, demanding that he institute Quo Warranto proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama in the District Court of Washington, D.C..
The importance of this letter is the fact that the quo warranto provisions of the District of Columbia Code provide that a 3rd party may institute a quo warranto action if the U.S. Attorney General fails to respond within 3 months to his request.
Dr. Orly Taitz wrote Holder on March 1st. In her letter, published today at her website, she demands that either he take action himself, or that her plaintiffs be granted ex-relator status to proceed in the name of the United States of America, as the D.C. code allows.
Quo warranto is a legal action whereby a plaintiff formally demands proof that the holder of an office, holds it lawfully, and if he does not, is empowered by the court to remove him from it. The Code of the Disctrict of Columbia contains provisions for quo warranto, in such cases as the usurpation of any federal office exercised within the district. Quo warranto can be used against Barack Hussein Obama because he is not a natural born citizen, and thus does not enjoy the Constitutional immunities of that office.
Dr. Taitzs letter reads in full:
Dear Mr. Holder,
On March 1st on behalf of my clients I have submitted to you a request to file Quo Warranto against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. The request was filed due to following troubling facts:
1. According to a number of licensed investigators National Databases show Mr. Obama using as many as 39 different Social Security numbers, which included the numbers of deceased individuals and numbers never assigned.
2. Number 042-68-4425 that Mr. Obama used for most of his life and is currently using while residing in the White House, is a number assigned to an individual born in 1890, who resided in the state of Connecticut and this Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut where Mr. Obama never resided.
3. One of the leading forensic experts in the country Ms. Sandra Ramsey Lines has prepared an affidavit, stating that Mr. Obamas short version Certification of Life Birth cannot be treated as genuine without seeing the original on file in the Health Department in HI.
4. The state of Hawaii since 1911 had in its statutes a provision allowing Foreign born children of Hawaiian residents of get Hawaiian Birth Certificates(currently statute 338-17) and currently statute 338-5 allows one to get a birth certificate based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence from the hospital.
5. In spite of over 100 law suits filed around the country and 12 Citizen Grand Jury indictments Mr. Obama refused to sign a consent to unseal his original birth certificate currently sealed in the Health Department of the state of Hawaii and all the other vital records.
6. Ms. Chiuomi Fukino, Director of the Health Department of the State of Hawaii has provided a statement that there is a document on file in Hawaii, however she refused to provide any information, as to what document is on file: whether it is a Birth Certificate given to a foreign born child of Hawaiian resident, whether it is an amended Birth certificate, obtained when Mr. Obama was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather. She refused to answer any questions as to whether his birth certificate was obtained based on a proper hospital birth certificate or based on a statement of one of his relatives only, which needs to be corroborated.
7. Regardless of place of birth of Mr. Obama, since birth and until now Mr. Obama had a split allegiance. He had British citizenship at birth, Kenyan since age 2 and Indonesian since age 5. Allegiance to other Nations goes as a clear violation of the Natural citizenship clause of the article 2 section 1 of the Constitution.
8. Under the Freedom of Information act 5 US 552, since no response was provided to numerous certified mail letters received by your office nine months ago, I demand a written response or Administrative hearing on the matter within 30 days. On behalf of my clients I demand an answer, as to when the Quo Warranto against Mr. Obama will be filed by the US Attorney General office, or in the alternative if the Attorney General office refuses to file Quo Warranto, I demand an ex-relator status for my clients to proceed with the Quo Warranto action against Mr. Obama in the DC court or the Supreme Court of the United States.
Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Counsel to the plaintiffs-ex relators.
It has been interesting to watch this topic.
It makes for some fascinating observations of human perception.
No it’s not a formality in the sense you mean.
If Holder doesn’t play the game, Orly can bypass him and get a Court to order the US Government to sue Obama for Quo Warranto.
Obviously Holder would be recused and probably a Special Prosecutor could be appointed.
Orly should have done this months ago. Carter told her to in his Judgement.
Would that Court Order come from the United States District Court for Fantasy Island?
A steak dinner, on me, at Mortons, to the first Birther who can post a cite to a Section of the United States Code giving the Courts the power to order the Attorney General to file a quo warranto against any Federal Officer, much less the President of the United States.
Thx! I would not have put it past her. From another secret source:
Dear Ms. Taitz,
I only just received your request for a Quo Warranto. I have been busy all week hopping around from coffee shop to coffee shop across the country. The coffee shops have “sufficient grounds.” You do not.
Eric Holder, esq.
parsy, the punster
New addition titled “Special Considerations for Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.”
The formality needs to be done however for anything else to follow. And Puleeze ignore our resident Obot trolls. CO
Um “That Barry has multiple SSN’s associated with his name(s) etc. and the fact an investigator into the same was found “murdered”.? All just too coincidental might one say? Usurper indeed!! CO
DC ST § 16-3503
Formerly cited as DC ST 1981 § 16-3503
District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Currentness
Division II. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Title 16. Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. (Refs & Annos) Best Section Begin
Chapter 35. Search Term Begin Quo Warranto. Search Term End Best Section End
Subchapter I. Actions Against Officers of the United States. (Refs & Annos)
§ 16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act; procedure.
If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.
I need to be flown in from England for my steak dinner. Could you book a suitable first class ticket?
PS I won’t hold you to it.
touche .. or is it spelled tushay ?
Why would the use a homosexual as a deep cover CIA agent, who could be blackmailed? He’s married and if he’s had affairs on his wife with men, that makes him someone who could be bought off. Doesn’t make sense.
There are several freepers who have stated that Ann Dunham's entire life story follows the typical course of someone working undercover for the CIA.
And that her son may have likely followed right in her footsteps.
Where is there any evidence that BHO is blackmailable due to his being gay? Do you consider Larry Sinclair to be a reliable credible source about anything?
Now, I haven't read any actual histories of any specific European intel agencies, but it was my general impression that many gay people held positions in them, both active in the field as spies and also back home in the office, so I'm unsure why you believe that being gay rules out working deep cover for an intel agency. I presume that there are many homosexuals and bisexuals currently employed by all of our intel agencies.
Does anyone know what specific work she did at AIPAC; was her position ever determined?
Also, she got her dental education in Israel, and then studied law on her own and passed the California bar exam without ever attending one day of law school, right?
Is Orly to this day still friends and associates with AIPAC, or is she even still employed there???
Anyone happen to know?
Speaking of BHO being a prime candidate for long term deep cover mole work for the CIA, doesn't Orly Taitz's general story look like someone who could be doing a favor, at the very least, for Mossad, and them doing a BIG FAV to BHO, making possible that all the documents submitted to U.S. courts are sooooooo screwy that the case never advances anywhere important??
WHY are we trusting Orly Taitz??????
Eric Holder and his top attorneys at Justice probably dictated it word for word, letter for letter, making it so absolutely wild that no judge would ever treat it seriously.
Do you by any chance know if Orly still works for AIPAC, or if she is closely associated with them anymore?
Social Security numbers get recycled.
Could be some problems with her kids' social security numbers if her contact was not on the ball with the administrative stuff.
I never met Obama’s mother and never worked for the CIA. However, I have no doubt in my mind that one or more persons in that family worked with the Spooks.
Now, as for Orly Taitz..something stinks about the whole situtation. But if you were working as a mole..wouldn’t you at least try to look somewhat credible???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.