Taitz demands Holder commence Quo Warranto against Obama

post and email ^ | Dec. 14, 2009 | John Charlton

[El Sordo]

It has been interesting to watch this topic.

It makes for some fascinating observations of human perception.

[plenipotentiary]

No it’s not a formality in the sense you mean.

If Holder doesn’t play the game, Orly can bypass him and get a Court to order the US Government to sue Obama for Quo Warranto.

Obviously Holder would be recused and probably a Special Prosecutor could be appointed.

Orly should have done this months ago. Carter told her to in his Judgement.

[Pilsner]

Orly can bypass him [Holder] and get a Court to order the US Government to sue Obama for Quo Warranto.

Would that Court Order come from the United States District Court for Fantasy Island?

A steak dinner, on me, at Mortons, to the first Birther who can post a cite to a Section of the United States Code giving the Courts the power to order the Attorney General to file a quo warranto against any Federal Officer, much less the President of the United States.

[Petronski]

Taitz demands....

ROFLMAOAPIMPRFI

Whew!

Can't breathe!

[parsifal]

Thx! I would not have put it past her. From another secret source:

Dear Ms. Taitz,

I only just received your request for a Quo Warranto. I have been busy all week hopping around from coffee shop to coffee shop across the country. The coffee shops have “sufficient grounds.” You do not.

Sincerely,

Eric Holder, esq.

parsy, the punster

[tired_old_conservative]

Title 7, Chapter 7, Insect Pests Generally

New addition titled “Special Considerations for Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.”

[Canadian Outrage]

The formality needs to be done however for anything else to follow. And Puleeze ignore our resident Obot trolls. CO

[Canadian Outrage]

Um “That Barry has multiple SSN’s associated with his name(s) etc. and the fact an investigator into the same was found “murdered”.? All just too coincidental might one say? Usurper indeed!! CO

[plenipotentiary]

DC ST § 16-3503

Formerly cited as DC ST 1981 § 16-3503

District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Currentness

Division II. Judiciary and Judicial Procedure

Title 16. Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters. (Refs & Annos) Best Section Begin

Chapter 35. Search Term Begin Quo Warranto. Search Term End Best Section End

Subchapter I. Actions Against Officers of the United States. (Refs & Annos)

§ 16-3503. Refusal of Attorney General or United States attorney to act; procedure.

If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.
http://weblinks.westlaw.com/result/default.aspx?action=Search&cfid=1&cnt=DOC&db=DC%2DST%2DWEB&eq=search&fmqv=c&fn=%5Ftop&method=WIN&n=11&origin=Search&query=quo+warranto&rlt=CLID%5FQRYRLT14110443181512&rltdb=CLID%5FDB59220433181512&rlti=1&rp=%2Fsearch%2Fdefault%2Ewl&rs=GVT1%2E0&service=Search&sp=DCC%2D1000&srch=TRUE&ss=CNT&sskey=CLID%5FSSSA6220433181512&sv=Split&vr=2%2E0

I need to be flown in from England for my steak dinner. Could you book a suitable first class ticket?

Thanks

PS I won’t hold you to it.

[thecodont]

Good one!

[American Constitutionalist]

So this article says that she wrote Holder on March 1st , as in ? March 1st 2009 ? ...... and he has 3 months to respond ?
Let's see, that was 9 months ago, and he had until June to respond, so ? what's the hold up ( pardon the pun ) ... ???
Or did she mean, March 1st of 2010 ? ... can't be, March 1st of 2010 is not here yet...

[American Constitutionalist]

touche .. or is it spelled tushay ?

[American Constitutionalist]

" Title 7, Chapter 7, Insect Pests Generally
New addition titled “Special Considerations for Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.”"

Thank you, I am relieved now, for a minute there I thought you were going to tell us that she ( or any lawyer who is taking up these cases ) does not have " Jurisdiction " and " Standing " under Quo Warranto in a D.C. court

[bluray]

Why would the use a homosexual as a deep cover CIA agent, who could be blackmailed? He’s married and if he’s had affairs on his wife with men, that makes him someone who could be bought off. Doesn’t make sense.

[hennie pennie]

I first read about the theory in another freeper's postings.

There are several freepers who have stated that Ann Dunham's entire life story follows the typical course of someone working undercover for the CIA.

And that her son may have likely followed right in her footsteps.

Where is there any evidence that BHO is blackmailable due to his being gay? Do you consider Larry Sinclair to be a reliable credible source about anything?

Now, I haven't read any actual histories of any specific European intel agencies, but it was my general impression that many gay people held positions in them, both active in the field as spies and also back home in the office, so I'm unsure why you believe that being gay rules out working deep cover for an intel agency. I presume that there are many homosexuals and bisexuals currently employed by all of our intel agencies.

[hennie pennie]

Orly Taitz used to work for AIPAC, right?

Does anyone know what specific work she did at AIPAC; was her position ever determined?

Also, she got her dental education in Israel, and then studied law on her own and passed the California bar exam without ever attending one day of law school, right?

Is Orly to this day still friends and associates with AIPAC, or is she even still employed there???

Anyone happen to know?

Speaking of BHO being a prime candidate for long term deep cover mole work for the CIA, doesn't Orly Taitz's general story look like someone who could be doing a favor, at the very least, for Mossad, and them doing a BIG FAV to BHO, making possible that all the documents submitted to U.S. courts are sooooooo screwy that the case never advances anywhere important??

WHY are we trusting Orly Taitz??????

[hennie pennie]

>>> "The grammar and use of language is atrocious. Doesn't she have access to a proofreader? And while we're at it that's a pretty cheesy looking website she has." <<<<

Eric Holder and his top attorneys at Justice probably dictated it word for word, letter for letter, making it so absolutely wild that no judge would ever treat it seriously.

Do you by any chance know if Orly still works for AIPAC, or if she is closely associated with them anymore?

[muawiyah]

Social Security numbers get recycled.

[muawiyah]

Again, one more time ~ I once met Obama's mother under circumstances that have led me to believe she became a CIA "asset" in Indonesia.

Could be some problems with her kids' social security numbers if her contact was not on the ball with the administrative stuff.

[RummyChick]

I never met Obama’s mother and never worked for the CIA. However, I have no doubt in my mind that one or more persons in that family worked with the Spooks.

Now, as for Orly Taitz..something stinks about the whole situtation. But if you were working as a mole..wouldn’t you at least try to look somewhat credible???