Posted on 12/18/2009 10:24:08 AM PST by American Dream 246
I disagree with you about Hillbuzz. I’ve been following the site for more than 18 months.
If this is true, and I hope it isn’t, Democrats may have some of theirs outed if they start outing Republicans. Presumably, they don’t want that to start happening. It could start an all-out war (pun intended).
The problem here is that it tends to be more damaging to ours than theirs (unless theirs represent a GOP district). Of course, a lot of our closeted ones tend to be RINOs, so they might even be doing us a favor. With respect to the allegations against Rep. Schock, if true, that could be quite damaging to him, since he seems to have a long, promising career ahead of him. Actually, what would be interesting is to have one of our guys outed and have them publicly acknowledge it, and state they do NOT support the gay agenda for marriage, et al. That would drive the gay rights lobby nuts.
If the Democrats had managed to recruit Lisa Madigan—as they had originally planned—to run for the US Senate in Illinois, they wouldn’t feel the need to spread such vicious rumors about Republican Candidates, because they’d actually have a Democratic Candidate who can stand on her own two feet without having to resort to such tactics.
This is a replay of what the Democrats did to Jack Ryan in 04.
And to prove the point, both Ryans are happily remarried now, and have or are expecting new additions to their families. If Ryan were to run again, people would see the SAME strong Candidate we had in 04—and the garbage the Democrats spread about him before wouldn’t raise an eyebrow.
Nice try, Dems. Voters—especially Republicans—aren’t going to allow themselves to be manipulated this way again so that you can hold onto “Obama’s Seat”.
Wow.
I’m divorced.
Do you think that might have happened because I’m a lesbian?
Or, could it be that I actually got divorced for one or more of the thousands of other reasons that most Americans divorce over?
And while we’re at it, why not speculate about the fact that while I’ve dated since my divorce, I still haven’t remarried. Again, think that’s because I’m a lesbian, or maybe just because I haven’t found the right man yet?
Let me guess. Since I’m just plain “Jane Q Public”, you’d probably be willing to give me the “benefit of the doubt”. However, if I were the same person BUT a public figure, then...well, of course, everything would be a SCANDAL, wouldn’t it?
I don’t care enough about liberal DIABO tool Mark Kirk to care let alone argue about whether he could be a homo. If he is is the evidence will come out.
If he’s being falsely accused I have no sympathy for him (I would for the decent Republican Schock). Kirk deserves every rumor that you could monger about.
BTW I’m just telling you what I heard, some people said that the marriage seemed like it could have been a “beard” deal. It never entered my mind prior to that. Bottom line is he’s RINO slag. If this could bring him down so we nominate a real Republican I think that’s terrific. I never intimated something ridiculous like everyone who get’s divorced is gay.
You don’t need to have any kind of simpatico feeling for Mark Kirk of all people. I’m sure no one thinks you’re a lesbian.
So, Impy, you’re basically saying that you’d be happy to see another good man get ripped apart in public for a rumor—including all of the pain that watching that would cause his loved ones—because you think he’s a “RINO slag” and you want to see a “real Republican” nominated?
“Real Republicans” DON’T win elections that way. Think about that.
He’s a socialist infiltrator in my party therefore he’s not a “good man” towards his constituents and that’s the only thing that matters to me. Maybe he loves puppy dogs and donates bone marrow to perfect strangers. I couldn’t give less of a damn, he votes like a democrat.
I’m for anything that will bring down a socialist. Politics is a war fought with votes and the other side (the side Kirk is on, the socialist side) doesn’t believe in rules of engagement which is part of the reason they usually win. I doubt he as his “loved ones” are in any “pain” only worried that “bigots” might not vote for a perceived ponce. It’s amusing to see socialist democrats try to sink a socialist “Republican” they only hurt their own cause. I’ll be a happy spectator if anything comes of this. (For the record I’d gladly vote for a small government conservative fruit and I don’t think blacks will turn out in greater than expected numbers just to vote against a gay)
Maybe he is light in the loafers, maybe not. Don’t care. They don’t just make up gay rumors for everyone. The ones about Mark Foley that existed for years prior to his coming out turned out to be right on the money.
And I don’t think he’s a RINO slag newbie (didn’t notice at first you signed up just now to defend Mark Kirk) I !know! he is and so does everyone else at this forum, you’ll find little love for him here, no IL freeper is gonna vote for him in the primary and half won’t in the general if gets the nomination.
Are you by chance a Kirk staffer?
Try www.liberalsycophant.com/forums/
SNIFF, post 29 and upthread
I think your colors are showing, Impy. I hope no one’s paying you alot of good money for this “strategy” that you’ve concocted.
Basically an “04 Democractic Redux on Ryan” hoping that Kirk’s Republican opponents will hop on board, huh?
Whether you’re the former or the latter, it’s obvious that you don’t understand the way “REAL Republicans” think.
First of all, “REAL Republicans” are a heck of alot smarter than you are, can VERY easily see through your little game, and actually find what you’re doing, well...insulting because it’s so transparent.
Second, “REAL Republicans” are honorable. Winning something this way is PETTY and WEAK—and therefore, not even worthwhile.
Like I said before: think about that.
You aren’t fooling anyone troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.