Posted on 01/01/2010 9:37:11 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies
It’s interesting. Democrats are big spenders on everything but national security, decade after decade, during peace or during war. Propose cutting almost any government program at any time and Democrats will scream and caterwaul until you’ve gone deaf. But they consistently lead the charge in cutting funding to DoD during peacetime and now, trying to cut funding for the war and Camp Delta at Gitmo.
If I’m right about the timing, 2009 is probably the next time we can look forward to a bona fide and spectacular al Qaeda attack attempt on American soil. Whatever they’re cooking up, it’s in the planning stages right now, in New York or the DC suburbs or wherever they believe they can operate without detection and will have access to their supplies and targets. Until they move or are busted, we can look forward to more idiotic posturing from Democrats who are at the same time promising to blow billions on new government programs for all kinds of things, while de-funding the war in Iraq and cutting the funds to house some very bad men at Gitmo. We can look forward to more context-free reports of carnage from all over the world, and we get to enjoy the downright delicious prospect of even Republicans deserting the war effort.
Their priorities tell us that virtually no Democrat and fewer Republicans are serious about the threat that those men at Gitmo and their mates in London pose.
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/06/2...h-close-gitmo/
perhaps liberals should leave national security to us
I meant 2010..opps
I guess this explains zero bowing to the Saudi king....whose family has been a benefactor of Obama.
If the media had done their job zero would never be where he is.
HUMMM, maybe the answer is to not bother with the catch part.
Seems that we need the License to kill policy back.
What info will you get from a captured Islamofascist.
.............
Quaran:
Let not the believers take for friends or helpers unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, (they) shall have no relation left with Allah except by way of precaution (”tat-taqooh”), that ye may guard yourselves (”tooqatan”) from them....[3:28]”
This can also answer the question of where his campaign money really came from.
Yes, I’ve always thought that zero got a ton of money from people like this. The American Presidency - bought and paid for by anti-Americans. Also another reason why they had to destroy Sarah - she would have cut into their gravy train by promoting drilling our own fuel.
Speaking of Wayne Simmons ... he's being acccused : Fox News Analyst Arrested for Lying About Working as a CIA Agent
by Helicondelta · 27 replies
theguardian.com ^ | October 16, 2015
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3349266/posts?page=4
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.