Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DM1
You know, incumbents have a great advantage typically, and while Dodd may be unpopular, how can any RAT distance themselves from bammy’s socialism? Just aint gunna happen easily, imho. That portion of the population that is inclined to defeat, or at least (the squishy middle) reign in our dear leader, will still not vote for the RAT in CT. And if many RAT incumbents leave office, I can't see that as a generally bad result.
32 posted on 01/06/2010 7:17:48 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: SeattleBruce

Incumbents do typically have some advantage unless it is an anti-incumbent year (like this one).
there are a few things to keep in mind here though. CT like NJ and MA are knee jerk Blue states. given the chance they will always vote for the Dem unless the particular individual is absolutely heinous and even that sometimes does not stop them (think Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy). CT is looking more and more to me like the 2002 Senate race in NJ where Toricelli (D) the corrupt dip would have lost to the R (I think his name was Doug Forrestal) by nearly 10 points. At the last moment the Dems pulled a bait and switch and threw Lautenberg into the race while Toricelli bowed out. Lautenberg won - he was an acceptable D within the stain of corruption on him. At this point and time I would have to equate CT with the NJ scenario. All this being said i do think it is POSSIBLE but not LIKELY that an R can win this seat. Depends on how sour the mood gets come November.


35 posted on 01/06/2010 7:32:50 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson