Skip to comments.
God bless Sam Alito
Lame Cherry ^
| January 27, 2010
| Lame Cherry
Posted on 01/28/2010 11:09:26 AM PST by opentalk
When Massachusetts elected Senator Scott Brown it was the Scott heard round the world.
When Barack Obama attacked the Supreme Court of these United States for upholding Constitutional Law in his State of the Union lecture, it was Obama being a 3rd world thug.
When Justice Sam Alito responded to Obama with "NOT TRUE", as the maniacal mob of Democrats were jeering and having bodily secretions like at a cock fight, it was an American Patriot in Sam Alito rekindling the words, "Don't Tread on Me!"
This is not about protocols in what Obama did in smashing the decorum of the US Capitol which is the People's House with his attacking another branch of Government, but it is about Barack Obama overstepping his Executive authority as nowhere in the Constitution does it give the Executive the right to browbeat the Supreme Court, hold it hostage in the US Capitol and then turn a jeering mob screaming at it loose on that sacred body to terrorize it.
That is intimidation and assault. It is exactly the motive and operation of Obama threatening US bankers with pitchfork mobs. In Obama State of the Union lecture, the mob was Charles Schumer and his pitchfork was was his tongue screaming at innocent Americans.
Chief Justice John Roberts has not done his job on the Supreme Court in protecting the Constitution. Justice Scalia has noted to Attorney Orly Taitz that it requires one more Justice to hear the Obama usurpation case. That Justice is no doubt Justice Kennedy who is surrounded by the patrician ilk of Ginsburg and associates.
It is past time that Justice Kennedy join now in heeding his Constitutional responsibility in protecting the United States Supreme Court as Barack Hussein Obama just threatened that 3rd branch of Government with assault. In true terror fashion, Barack Hussein Obama attempted to intimidate the United States Supreme Court in the United States Capitol.
For the protection of the Court as Mr. Obama has now progressed from Lawrence Sinclair, to bloggers, to Rush Limbaugh, to FOX News and now to the US Supreme Court to bully it so Obama's re election will be on his criminal ACORN money fraud grounds which allowed him to steal the Presidency of these United States in 2008.
This must stop immediately and the American Justices on the Court must now be roused to hold an immediate hearing, demanding that Barack Hussein Obama be held accountable for assault upon the 9 Justices of the Supreme Court of these United States. Mr. Obama's assault was an attack upon the Constitutional Government of these United States and the shattering of his oath he took twice.
As evidence against Mr. Obama, he also attacked minority Constitutional rights in his lecture by threatening Republicans to not filibuster in the United States Senate, but instead to bow to Obama's mandates and join with his illegal destruction of the United States form of government.
The US Supreme Court in checks and balances can indeed schedule hearings to investigate, and demand that Barack Hussein Obama produce his real Hawaiian birth certificate, US passport, college tuition information, all to prove he is or is not a US Citizen. Thus finding he is not, the US Court can negate every single issue Mr. Obama is connected to as unConstitutional.
Justice Sam Alito in upholding Truth, Justice and the American Way spoke the most resilient of Free Speech in informing the cheering Obamaniac mobs that their leader is a liar. Mr. Obama broke his oath in promising to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States by attacking the US Supreme Court in 3rd world thuggery.
Mr. Obama must be removed by the US Supreme Court in a case of their own making as the final check and balance on a Barack Obama making war on branch of the United States Government.
Semper Fi Justice Alito.
TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: alito; campaignfinance; constitutional; freespeech; obama; obamalie; samalito; stateoftheunion; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
01/28/2010 11:09:26 AM PST
by
opentalk
To: opentalk
Ummmm.... One thing I saw before all this and bothered me when I heard it... Along with the good Justice Alito, most of us thought **THE ONE** could read. No foreign contributions prohibition is not touched in the SCOTUS decision. I guess we were all wrong, **THE ONE** can’t read...
2
posted on
01/28/2010 11:13:23 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
To: opentalk
Roberts and Alito are starting to show their worth, thank God.
3
posted on
01/28/2010 11:13:33 AM PST
by
Scanian
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Scanian
I believe Kennedy wrote the majority opinion.
A mistake by the maoist as Kennedy has been known to be the swing vote to the left.
5
posted on
01/28/2010 11:16:09 AM PST
by
Carley
(Are you better off now than one year ago? HELL NO!!!!!)
To: opentalk
Obama is just following his game plan....use Rules for Radicals whenever possible.
To: opentalk
I hope he lives another 50 years.
What a great replacement of Sandra O’Conner.
This is one area that Bush excelled in, selction of Justices.
To: opentalk
Alito and Roberts were the best thing about Bush’s legacy. They stood up to the “Borking” and “High Tech Lynching” attempts.
8
posted on
01/28/2010 11:22:17 AM PST
by
dancusa
(Political Correctness is a firewall to the truth.)
To: opentalk
Samuel Alito is a good man. He knows a crook and mobster when he see one because he put them in jail when he was a U.S. Attorney. I think he also had worked for Reagan head of the Justice Dept who is conservative and I cannot think of his name.
9
posted on
01/28/2010 11:23:16 AM PST
by
Frantzie
(TV - sending Americans towards Islamic serfdom - Cancel TV service NOW)
To: opentalk
Thomas, Scalia, Alito and Roberts are our goal tenders for a free America.
10
posted on
01/28/2010 11:27:25 AM PST
by
dancusa
(Political Correctness is a firewall to the truth.)
To: Scanian
You know they are doing the right thing if they have the “living constitutionalists” SCREECHING! It is about time.
To: opentalk
"
12
posted on
01/28/2010 11:38:52 AM PST
by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: opentalk
Justice Alito owes no one an apology for what he said.
13
posted on
01/28/2010 11:39:51 AM PST
by
popdonnelly
(Yes, we disagree - no, we won't shut up - no, we won't quit.)
To: opentalk
nowhere in the Constitution does it give the Executive the right to browbeat the Supreme Court, hold it hostage in the US Capitol and then turn a jeering mob screaming at it loose on that sacred body to terrorize it. It is reminiscent of Sadam Hussein having people taken out of assembly and shot for being supposed traitors. If this was intended to consolidate Obama's power, then it failed. It was an embarrassing moment and showed just what a child our president is.
To: Bearshouse
It appears that Charles Schumer was intentionally seated behind him to lead the cheering on camera with the judge in the picture.
middle school bully tactics.
15
posted on
01/28/2010 11:53:43 AM PST
by
opentalk
To: Le Chien Rouge
From Big Journalism:
Soros nearly single-handedly financed the lobbying efforts to pass McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform. In so doing, he was able to harness far greater political control for himself.
Now that large portions of the law have been deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, a fight will be necessary to salvage his leverage. President Obama has already signaled that this fight will be one of his own priorities
16
posted on
01/28/2010 12:03:20 PM PST
by
opentalk
To: Carley
Did you see Kennedy's face in the video? He looked as disgusted as Alito did. Even Justice Sotomayor looked embarrassed... Somehow, I don't think that the dissenters in the Citizens United decision appreciated Zero's clumsy choice to tar the entire SCOTUS with the same brush.
To: opentalk
President Wrong on Citizens United Case [Bradley A. Smith]Tonight the president engaged in demogoguery of the worst kind, when he claimed that last week's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, "open[ed] the floodgates for special interests including foreign corporations to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities."
The president's statement is false.
The Court held that 2 U.S.C. Section 441a, which prohibits all corporate political spending, is unconstitutional. Foreign nationals, specifically defined to include foreign corporations, are prohibiting from making "a contribution or donation of money or ather thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State or local election" under 2 U.S.C. Section 441e, which was not at issue in the case. Foreign corporations are also prohibited, under 2 U.S.C. 441e, from making any contribution or donation to any committee of any political party, and they prohibited from making any "expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication."
This is either blithering ignorance of the law or demagoguery of the worst kind.
Bradley A. Smith is Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault Designated Professor of Law at Capital University Law School
18
posted on
01/28/2010 12:30:07 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid!)
To: Jake from AZ
One reason for that is that 0baMao didn't criticize based on disagreement with the main premise of the decision. He told a bald-face lie about what the law will allow. As my post above shows there are specific provisions in the law that prevent exactly what 0buttholesurfer claimed it allows.
No interpretation of law or Constitution is even in play. The law itself clearly and precisely defines the exact opposite of what 0blahblah said it does.
19
posted on
01/28/2010 12:38:50 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid!)
To: opentalk
Of course it was setup and apparently advertised. Watch the person behind Alito nudge his neighbor in a “get ready, here it comes” type of moment just before the phrase is spoken.
>It appears that Charles Schumer was intentionally seated behind him to lead the cheering on camera with the judge in the picture.
middle school bully tactics.
20
posted on
01/28/2010 1:09:50 PM PST
by
joedel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson