No, but I think they knew more than what they are saying.
For instance, Jamie Gorelick should NOT have been on the panel. I think most objective people agree on this. Thus, why I think we need a new investigation to get to the truth.
What did they “cover up?” Specifics, please.
Also, if we’re supposed to only base our evaluation of Medina on her positions on Texas politics, does that mean we should still elect her if she thought the Earth was flat? How about if she was a holocaust denier?
What do you think the truth is?
What do you say it is?