Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sayonara, Sci Fi?
Grand Rants ^ | 02-23-10 | Alan Speakman

Posted on 02/23/2010 5:23:39 AM PST by Stoutcat

There are good sci fi movies, mediocre sci fi movies, bad sci fi movies, and really bad sci fi movies*. And each movie flavor has something to recommend it to viewers. (I have to admit that one of my favorites is The Giant Claw.)

The unifying theme throughout, of course, is the science fiction element. And from the great movies to those which are laughably awful, the element of science always plays a role in advancing the storyline, developing the characters, or simply defining the world in which the story is set.

But if Prof. Sidney Perkowitz has his way, you may never see another movie like “Avatar”, “Star Trek”, “Godzilla”, or “The Giant Claw” again...

(Excerpt) Read more at grandrants.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hollywood; perkowitz; politicallycorrect; sciencefiction; scifi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
Political correctness run amok.
1 posted on 02/23/2010 5:23:39 AM PST by Stoutcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

Another Ivory Tower Dilettante who thinks he knows what’s best for us all.... probably a failed screenwriter as well.


2 posted on 02/23/2010 5:27:19 AM PST by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

Based on his reasoning, love stories should be banned, too. Fairy tales. Talking animal stories. All stories.

The man has no imagination or heart.


3 posted on 02/23/2010 5:28:06 AM PST by FrogMom (No such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat; KevinDavis

Oh please. If I had any animation skills, I’d make some pretty bad scifi on the kitchen counter. With toys! lol.


4 posted on 02/23/2010 5:30:11 AM PST by GeronL (Political Philosophy: I Own Me (yep, boiled down to 6 letters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom
Based on his reasoning, love stories should be banned, too. Fairy tales. Talking animal stories. All stories.

Please say they will not cannot include Spongebob in this list of banned movies.

They would also have to include any biographies of rational liberals who were born after 1950. That is real fiction.

5 posted on 02/23/2010 5:34:04 AM PST by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom

Love stories = sci fi?

Who hurt you?


6 posted on 02/23/2010 5:38:47 AM PST by dangus (Nah, I'm not really Jim Thompson, but I play him on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom

(Yeah, I’m joking with you.)


7 posted on 02/23/2010 5:39:25 AM PST by dangus (Nah, I'm not really Jim Thompson, but I play him on FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

I must have missed the part that pointed out where Prof. Sidney Perkowitz has the power to ban science fiction movies. “Avatar” has pulled in what, $2.5 billion worldwide? With that kind of money a movie could scrap physics altogether and it’d still be made.


8 posted on 02/23/2010 5:41:42 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

How bout’ “Attack of the Crab Monsters”? They had GIANT claws too!


9 posted on 02/23/2010 5:43:31 AM PST by Renegade ("Bring it on while I still don't need glasses to shoot your eye out ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

The author has a point. Science fiction originally meant extrapolation of the scientific state-of-the-art to tell a story. Star Trek actually went very far to be true to this ideal.

Avatar isn’t science fiction, but fantasy, like Harry Potter. It doesn’t make it bad, it is just a different genre.


10 posted on 02/23/2010 5:44:24 AM PST by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

From the article:


Science fiction movies should be allowed only one major transgression of the laws of physics, according to a US professor who has won backing from a number of his peers after creating a set of guidelines for Hollywood.

The proposals are intended to curb the film industry’s worst abuses of science by confining scriptwriters to plotlines that embrace the suspension of disbelief but stop short of demanding it in every scene.

The guidelines are by Sidney ­Perkowitz, a professor of physics at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia and a member of the Science and Entertainment Exchange, an advisory body run by the US National Academy of Sciences.


When you see someone wanting to control and confine scriptwriters’ imaginations is another sign of how the USA is turning into a Soviet Union-like country.


11 posted on 02/23/2010 5:47:33 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

SSSSSHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhh - don’t let Oboy hear about him!!!!
He’ll make him a Space CZAR if we’re not careful!

Just one problem tho....Oboy the Zer0 has no interest whatsoever in Space or advancing technology. But that goes with his idealogically backward ‘religion’.


12 posted on 02/23/2010 5:47:45 AM PST by 2Wheels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom

“Based on his reasoning, love stories should be banned, too. Fairy tales. Talking animal stories. All stories.

The man has no imagination or heart.”

Guy’s a Taliban/Al Qaeda Muzzi Fundie who just doesn’t know it yet.


13 posted on 02/23/2010 5:48:18 AM PST by flowerplough ( Pennsylvania today - New New Jersey meets North West Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
When you see someone wanting to control and confine scriptwriters’ imaginations is another sign of how the USA is turning into a Soviet Union-like country.

And like I said, if it comes down to a choice between correct science and a $100 million boxoffice gross then science will lose every time.

14 posted on 02/23/2010 5:49:48 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stoutcat

I hate to say it, but I with the professor here. Nothing irritates me more than a so-called science fiction tv show or movie where the “science” is completely fictional and has no relation to the real world.

I’ve often thought that it wouldn’t cost all that much for Hollywood to hire a scientific consultant or two to vet scripts for scientific realism. Sticking to actual physical laws needn’t detract from the story. In fact, it would be far less distracting than the frequent scientific inaccuracies, which are so numerous that my husband and son don’t want me watching those shows with them. Because I’m either correcting the scientific blunders, or laughing out loud at them, sometimes during what are supposed to be serious, dramatic moments.


15 posted on 02/23/2010 5:53:13 AM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
Science fiction movies should be allowed only one major transgression of the laws of physics, according to a US professor who has won backing from a number of his peers after creating a set of guidelines for Hollywood.

So I guess that would mean no more "Day After Tomorrow" type flicks with EEEEvil Climate Change as the enemy. Maybe this is worth doing after all....

16 posted on 02/23/2010 5:59:26 AM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

What part of the word fiction in the term science fiction do you not understand?


17 posted on 02/23/2010 6:03:34 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

As a Mystery Science Theatre fan I came to appreciate cheesy science fiction movies. Some were so bad they were good...


18 posted on 02/23/2010 6:05:26 AM PST by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Gonna disagree with you and HospiceNurse both on this one. Science fiction was originally created to try to envision the future. Right or wrong didn't matter. Think of the classic 30s, 40s, and 50s sci fi: E. E. "Doc" Smith, Heinlein, Azimov, L. Sprague DeCamp. They tried to envision where science could take us in the next hundred years... Right or wrong, they took a stab at it and told great stories. And when you get right down to it, even what we think we know today may very well be wrong tomorrow (think: the earth is flat; the sun revolves around the earth; relativity; time travel, etc.) Who are we, then, to legislate what someone deems possible (however unlikely)? How can we allow a committe mandate what's in an author's or movie-maker's imagination? Orwell's Thought Police may be coming to a theater near you sooner than you think.
19 posted on 02/23/2010 6:11:57 AM PST by Stoutcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

Good lord, people.....

These are movies...Entertainment...Time to rest and relax...Movies should have NO influence on everyday REAL life....They are SCRIPTED to entertin...Life is not...

Sit back...enjoy the show and don’t spend all your time trying to analyze the freakin’ film....

ENTERTAINMENT!!!!!!!!!!!! Get it?????


20 posted on 02/23/2010 6:12:06 AM PST by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson