Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ScottBrownForPresident.com domain name for sale (Browniacs Jumping Ship)
ScottBrownforPresident.com ^ | 02/23/10 | hollywoodmeme

Posted on 02/23/2010 2:35:26 PM PST by nhwingut

Scott Brown and four other Republicans have joined the Democrats to end debate on a phony jobs bill that even the Associated Press points out would create an insignificant number of jobs. Perhaps Mr. Brown should run as a Independent in 2012. ScottBrownForPresident.com is for sale, email us if you are interested.

(Excerpt) Read more at scottbrownforpresident.wordpress.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; brown; brown2012; domain; president; scottbrown2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2010 2:35:27 PM PST by nhwingut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

I bid a penny!


2 posted on 02/23/2010 2:43:29 PM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

I own the URL TheKenyanImpostor.com

What am I bid?


3 posted on 02/23/2010 2:43:32 PM PST by y6162 (q1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

There wasn’t any reason for people to feel deceived by Scott Brown, he made no secret of what he believed.

I never could understand the irrational exuberance in Scott Brown.


4 posted on 02/23/2010 2:47:16 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Pay me $1000 and I’ll take it off your hands.


5 posted on 02/23/2010 2:48:53 PM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

I’m not sure what a “Browniact” is, but there are those of us from Mass. who got ourselves personally involved in getting votes for Mr. Brown in the hopes that he’d stand firm against Obama and the socialists at every turn. He has been a disappointment so far. He has voted for Obama’s latest stimulus bill and has voted in favor of placing a leftist Obamacrat to the Federal bench. He explains himself on the “jobs bill” fiasco by telling his constituents that “they just don’t know what this bill is all about”. Yeah, he and Obama have merely failed to make us understand.


6 posted on 02/23/2010 2:48:57 PM PST by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiminycricket000

can you spell Arlen Specter II


7 posted on 02/23/2010 2:54:25 PM PST by Breto (never accept the premise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dila813
I never could understand the irrational exuberance in Scott Brown.

Bingo. Same goes for the "he's worse than Hitler" crowd. He is what he is - a moderate Republican from Massachusetts, of all places. Why can't we just agree that his election was a very good thing without thinking that he'd be a good choice for President?

8 posted on 02/23/2010 2:56:54 PM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Who is Scott Brown?


9 posted on 02/23/2010 2:57:54 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiminycricket000
He has been a disappointment so far. He has voted for Obama’s latest stimulus bill...

He voted to end debate.That's not exactly the same as voting for the bill itself.

...and has voted in favor of placing a leftist Obamacrat to the Federal bench.

I've heard that he voted "nay".What's your source?

10 posted on 02/23/2010 2:58:25 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I like Scott Brown and I would support him for president.


11 posted on 02/23/2010 2:59:49 PM PST by cherry (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

If I could have Scott Brown for President tomorrow, you bet your bippy I’d say yes. nuff said.


12 posted on 02/23/2010 3:00:17 PM PST by onona (dbada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813
"I never could understand the irrational exuberance in Scott Brown."

Then you've never been in a state dominated by Teddy Kennedy for 50 years.

That said, I'm disappointed in Brown. He made it seem as though he'd block the entire Obama agenda by saying repeatedly "I'm the 41st vote"; and "This is the peoples' seat. Now he says he was sent to D.C. to be an independent 'bipartisan', not necessarily a representative of what his electorate wants. He's just another typical politician, slick, weasley and deceptive.

We in Mass. had more in mind than just Obamacare regarding that all important 41st vote. Who would have voted for Scott Brown had he told us that he'd vote for the next Screwulous Bill within two weeks of his being sworn in? He's got a real problem now. I will say this with certainty, if Brown thinks he can go against the grain of those who put him over the top in Mass., (the CONSERVATIVE independents), and get re-elected in 2012, he's mistaken. Brown has but two options for re-election; he either stands against Obama and actually cast that "41st vote" in the name of conservatism, or he's got to become just another New England RINO, (i.e. Snow, Collins), to please the liberals. My guess is that he's betting on the liberal RINO route.

13 posted on 02/23/2010 3:01:52 PM PST by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Good idea - a guy who is OK with MA, won’t be a good sell to the rest of the country - MA folks march to the beat of a different drummer...off a cliff...screaming...


14 posted on 02/23/2010 3:05:08 PM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiminycricket000

So you folks in MA have been “screwed” in your votes, um, two times in a year and a quarter...?


15 posted on 02/23/2010 3:07:01 PM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
"Why can't we just agree that his election was a very good thing without thinking that he'd be a good choice for President?"

Because America is in dire straits, that's why. We are at war to save our culture from Islam and from millions of non-assimilating illegal aliens. We are in economically desperate times. Our freedoms are under attack from our own politicians and justices. Christianity has been banned from the public by government. We are strangling ourselves with political correctness.

Scott Brown was elected because he ran on being the "41st" vote, and that phrase was declared again and again to represent that he would stand firmly against the entire Obama agenda. Brown represented real 'hope and change'. He's been a major disappointment so far.

16 posted on 02/23/2010 3:10:45 PM PST by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jiminycricket000

I think it was in an interview with Cavuto last week where he said that sometimes he’ll be the 41st vote and other times he’ll be the 60th vote. I was worried when I heard it. Not less than a day or too later did my fears come true. Sorry I ever sent him a dime. Beck was right when he said on his radio show , before he outed Debra Medina, that with the rise of the Tea Party, we need to take a long hard look at who is running and who we choose to support. Lots of people are surfacing with little to no track record.


17 posted on 02/23/2010 3:16:04 PM PST by curth (Sarah Palin: Fighting for the Soul Of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cherry
I like Scott Brown and I would support him for president.

From what little I've seen and heard of him he seems like he might be worthy of my respect.But it's far,*far* too early for *me*,at least,to decide that he deserves to be President.

18 posted on 02/23/2010 3:24:23 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Host The Beer Summit-->Win The Nobel Peace Prize!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
"He voted to end debate.That's not exactly the same as voting for the bill itself."

Voting to end the debate in the Senate means that it goes to the House. If the House then votes for it, the bill only needs a 51-49 vote to pass in the Senate. That, in essence, means that Brown voted for the bill.

As for my source of Brown voting yeah to Obama's latest federal judge nominee, I heard it today on the Howie Carr show. A caller stated that Brown voted for Obama's nominee and Carr agreed with him. Unless I heard wrong, or there was a misunderstanding, that was what I heard on the radio.

19 posted on 02/23/2010 3:25:49 PM PST by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: matginzac
"So you folks in MA have been “screwed” in your votes, um, two times in a year and a quarter...?"

What you're trying to say is that Brown is an improvement over Teddy Kennedy or Martha Coakley. My reply is that we were looking for much more than just an "improvement". This is a small state, and people who have never been involved in politics before got active, went out and helped Scott Brown get elected. His OBVIOUS mandate was to STOP BARAK OBAMA. We were not hoping for some "improvement", we were looking to survive as a free nation. We need leaders to stand up to Obama and his communist ilk at every turn, no compromising ala John McAmnesty, who will "go along to get along". That mentality won't get the job done.

20 posted on 02/23/2010 3:36:56 PM PST by jiminycricket000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson