Obama Birth Certificate - Hawaii Revised Law

vibe.us ^ | 12/27/2008 | Forsetti

[Danae]

Excellent article and even better questions. Very very nice work BT!

[mojitojoe]

Orly.... is so not hot. Sorry.

[Man50D]

Note the term used for BO's/BS's father's race is "African". The problem for BO/BS is that the Department of Health,Education and Welfare used the term "Negro", not "African at the time BO/BS was born. Someone who could not stand the politically incorrect termed changed it to fit their ideology.

[little jeremiah]

It’s getting strange.

[parsifal]

Do you have any realistic proof of this assertion?

parsy, the curious

[TigersEye]

OBOBO HUSSEIN’S RESUME would be thrown out of every employer’s search effort because of all the empty spaces!

That's for sure. I don't know if he could even get hired to pick up trash on a construction site with so little info about him. His attitude would be the first strike.

[TigersEye]

Nope, African is not a race and no one has ever used it to denote a race at any time in history.

[TigersEye]

The Kos COLB for 0bummer.

COLB of one of the Nordyke twins born the day after 0bummer.

[mojitojoe]

There was an ad on Craig’s list for Obots. I guess all the jobs are filled and some were given FR as their assignment.

[Man50D]

Do you have any realistic proof of this assertion?

In 1961, the Public Health Services, U. S Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Division published the "Vital Statistics of the United States. Page 231 contains the requirements for "Race and color." www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsus_1961_1.pdf

Race and color

Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaii

[BP2]

Parsley, have YOU seen Obama's "birth certificate"? No?!

Let me tell you about that paper trail in August 2008:

Obama's Chicago Campaign gave TWO hand-picked partisan hacks (below) a copy
of his "birth certificate," which now reportedly resides back with Obama's staff.

Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature.
Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy.

Obama has a CONSISTENT record of LYING. HE IS CORRUPT.
He's PROVEN this time and time again.

Obama is not worthy of ANYONE'S TRUST in this country,
Right, Center and especially the Left.

The truth about Obama's birth certificate (FactCheck.org)
–by Jess Henig, with Joe Miller

Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature.
Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy.

[Semper Mark]

"I find it futile and distractive."

------------

"It is killing us folks. I think it is planted by DU people."

Uh huh.

You're an admitted Paul-bot.

Are you a 9-11 "Truther" as well?

[TigersEye]

What Is The Evidence Of A Counterfeit

Many people who also saw this image (see Appendix A) had said that it was a "fake," and that the document pictured in the image could not possibly be genuine.  The image anomalies that they pointed out as proof of a forgery included those that I had found and reported, working independently.  Here is an annotated list of them:

1. The image contains digital signatures of Photoshop

2. Only one side of alleged COLB shown (COLB is two-sided)

3. Missing second-fold line while first fold-line is shown

4. Missing the embossed Seal of Hawaii

5. Missing the State Registrar's signature

6. Unusual and unnatural pixilation between the letters of text data

7. Original text was removed by pasting a layer of background over them

8. Different text was typed onto a text layer and merged with background layer

9. Pixel blocks of text data are different from the data headers

10. Heavy and unnecessary sharpening of the whole image, except for the border

11. Border was created as a separate layer and merged with other layers

12. Border pattern is more blurred than the background

13. Border pattern more transparent than those on genuine scans

14. Top and bottom black border bars have less pixilation than text

15. Border bars are more black in color than any of the text

16. Absence of green, background pixels inside the border bar text

17. White lines between border bars and pattern (both sides)

18. Image colors are very different from scan images of real COLBs

19. Lack of pixilation in black rectangle covering certificate number

20. Different blocking artifacts from JPG compression found across the image

It's Invalid

In Dr. Ron Polarik's final report, "Obama's Born Conspiracy," these anomalies are explained in greater detail.

The consensus among all of us was that this Certification of Live Birth document image (COLB) had been heavily doctored.  What we didn't know were the lengths to which the Obama Campaign and his enablers in the media went to rebuff any claims of forgery by personally attacking anyone for even suggesting it.  They called us "tin-foil hat wearing, right-wing conspiracy nuts," or "birthers" for short, but these titles are tame in comparison to the vicious and virulent slurs hurled our way.  Rather than respond with some confirmatory evidence to support the claim that the scan image was genuine, they offered all kinds of logical excuses as to why it wouldn't be fake, coupled with comments from individuals and fact-checking groups claiming to be non-partisan but clearly shilling for Obama.  The common denominator here is that all of them failed to provide a single shred of valid evidence that Obama's actual COLB document was even printed in June 2007 by Hawaii's DOH, let alone scanned a year later.

One thing that no one could deny was that a black, graphic rectangle was added to the image to redact the COLB's certificate number, and then resaved, permanently altering the COLB shown in the image, and in effect, changing the image itself.  The following caveat appears on the COLB document:

ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE

In other words, "Which part of this caveat did the "birther" critics NOT understand?

[El Sordo]

No dental records?

[parsifal]

Thanks. That last half meg is still downloading. I think I can put another birther myth to rest.

First, in 1961, a lot of this stuff was done by hand and typewriter. Not a lot of control over input fields. There was nothing on page 231 to prevent “African” from being input, because, if you go back up to the beginning, there is a chart of the route the records took. (page 5)

This is a federal document and there are several steps in the states before the records make it to the feds. If you notice, the main emphasis is white/non-white.

Page 231 includes Japanese and Chinese as races. What if daddy or mommy came from India? Vietnam? Samoa? Eqypt? The preparer would probably type in whatever they wanted because the form don’t specify. HDOH says they put in the race the couple wants but who knows if this was done in 1961 or not. Or they could opt out to “Other non white”.

Whatever, there is nothing here to indicate that anything couldn’t be put in the blank. Presumably, recoding could be done either at the state level or the federal level.

From the brief scan, some states for example used the “illegitimate” field, others didn’t. In short, there appears to be no mechanism to force the data at the input level to be coded a certain way. There were preferable ways, and one might hope all state level bureaucrats complied with all suggested guideline. But, no way to tell.

So, birthers can not claim that “African” could not have been entered.

parsy

[TigersEye]

Nothing.