Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unbalanced and Unethical Dem to Replace Merely Unethical Dem (Stark for Rangel)
The Voice of Reason ^ | March 4, 2010 | Texas Peartree

Posted on 03/04/2010 11:48:18 AM PST by Texas Peartree

Charlie Rangel may be many things; liberal, stubborn, corrupt, greedy . . . wait, I forgot my point. Oh yeah, Charlie Rangel may be many things, but crazy he is not. However, in order to "temporarily" replace Rangel as the Chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means, the Democrats have come up with the perfect guy: Pete Stark (D-CA).

Now Pete is both corrupt and crazy, which may be entertaining. He is corrupt, as he claimed a Maryland homestead exemption on his taxes while representing California in Congress. California has a law that you must have a primary residence in their state in order to be a Congressman representing California. In fairness, Stark was cleared after a bizarre, invective-filled interview with Ethics investigators, which including Stark's use of a semi-hidden camera.

Pete is also Stark raving mad on occasion. For example, unlike Senator Bunning's recent causal rudeness to the press, Stark actually threatened to defenestrate (throw out of a window) a reporter whom he was mad at. Take that, liberal media!

Stark also is famous for having claimed on the Floor of the US House of Representatives that then-President George W. Bush wanted to send troops to Iraq in order to get, "their heads blown off for the president's amusement."

Rangel is no prize, but at least he was a war hero in Korea. Stark is next in line by seniority. This begs the question: would the Democrats really take power away from the Congressman representing Harlem, only to give it to the Congressman representing Shutter Island?

(Excerpt) Read more at corybirenbaum.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: rangel; stark

1 posted on 03/04/2010 11:48:18 AM PST by Texas Peartree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: FrPR

It is still up in the air who will take over the Committee. My point is that we should look closer at the next in line.


3 posted on 03/04/2010 11:52:05 AM PST by Texas Peartree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

I heard Sander Levin.


4 posted on 03/04/2010 11:54:50 AM PST by freespirited (We're not the Party of No. We're the Party of HELL NO!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FrPR
This article is like sooooo three hours ago.
5 posted on 03/04/2010 11:55:46 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

LOL - That’s a funny headline.


6 posted on 03/04/2010 11:56:09 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Peartree

Apparently San Fran Nan did NOT need FOX news plastering Stark’s lunacy all over the air waves, so he is OUT!


7 posted on 03/04/2010 11:56:26 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

dang. I miss Stark already.

8 posted on 03/04/2010 12:04:22 PM PST by BlueDragon (there is no such thing as a "true" compass, all are subject to both variation & deviation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark; Impy

Stark Raving Mad

http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=13080
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, May 10, 2004

[Recorded on an answering machine to a VETERAN: Near the middle of his rambling message, the Congressman promised Dow, “But I’ll call you back later.” Why? Stark explained, “[To] let you tell me why you think you’re such a great, god-[bleep]ed hero.”


9 posted on 03/05/2010 3:23:45 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; fieldmarshaldj

Stark (interesting the only avowed atheist in congress) has a terrible reputation.


10 posted on 03/07/2010 11:01:09 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Got that right! What’s Pelosi snorting up there?


11 posted on 03/07/2010 11:47:19 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Well they realized that couldn’t let Pete have it. So they’ve given it to Sander Levin.


12 posted on 03/07/2010 11:57:49 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Sander Levin — is he supposedly clean?


13 posted on 03/07/2010 12:03:16 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Barack Hussein Obama, mmm, mmm, mmm. [Only leftist intellectuals publicly pick their noses.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

As far as I know he’s clean.

But he’s a rabid union shill.


14 posted on 03/07/2010 12:06:55 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson