Posted on 03/05/2010 4:25:45 AM PST by Spaulding
Don’t let then know we’re on to them. Use the codebook.
The raven may sing at midnight, but tapioca is a better thickening starch.
I thought that's what Orly does when she goes to court.
Hey, when I was in the BGOTE, I found their manual override password phrase. It helps you unlock and understand ALL their evidence. Every single bit!
Circulus in demonstrando.
parsy, who barely made it back out......
No, its what I’m doing when I ask them to translate their stuff into English.
parsy, who is back out to the net to research for a while....
Or not
No, its what I’m doing when I ask them to translate their stuff into English.
parsy, who is back out to the net to research for a while....
No, its what I’m doing when I ask them to translate their stuff into English.
parsy, who is back out to the net to research for a while....
If there were no distinction, the judge wouldn't have made one in the first place, now would he?
“Blessent mon cœur d’une langueur monotone”
Why does it make sense to treat the Natural Born Citizen clause—which is the Constitutional guard against internal overthrow of our country—with a low threshold of proof rather than a high one? By definition, this guard defends the seat of power of our nation.
Why would you spend countless hours on the internet advocating the lower threshold of proof?
Unless you favor overthrow of our nation?
The important point, besides the history and record of the court, is that there has never been another interpretation of natural born citizen in Supreme Court proceedings. There have been some idiotic circuit court decisions, but they demonstrate that this is about power politics - “the persuasion of power” described by Andy Stern - rather than legal reasoning.
Talking about scrubbing, Patrick Leahy has removed the reference to Senate Res. 511, which he co-sponsored, from his senate web site. It is still available in the senate archives, but that he selectively removed 511 tells us the pressure is having an effect.
Yes. And that's why there are more trolls. And why they are frantic.
The officials in power know that the American people cannot accept being exposed as fools and lunatics; therefore, the truth will remain forever hidden. No historian who desires professional recognition will ever touch the matter. Just like the scientists who endorse evolution to garner foundation and government grants
Again, the American people are not capable of understanding the differences here. Its a half-century of dumbed-down “education” at play.
There is no “thresh hold”. You don’t kinda move the bar depending on how one feels today. What there is, is case law. There is Wong. And Wong defines NBC.
You don’t start playing with laws, and making up thresh holds because you don’t like who won the election. That’s what they do in places like uh uh Venezuela. You know, you just change the law as you want...And Cuba, I think a lot of their law is kinda subjective. Whatever a couple of guys named Castro want it to be.
You are lucky enough to live here. You should take the time to understand the laws that apply to this.
parsy
I haven’t a clue what the hell you’re writing about or how it applies to me in this thread that I’ve never seen and in which I have zero interest. Kindly remove me from your ping list.
I have heard no cogent counter argument to the assertion that every bill Obama signs is invalid. Trillions of dollars in debt have been committed with the authority of an ineligible chief executive. With Obama and the Chicago Mafia in control of justice, seeing what they did with Congressman Deal, most injured parties will keep a low profile. Obama is, at best, a one term president. Everything he has done can be undone with one honest law suit. Perhaps it will be Kerchner/Apuzzo. Taitz has a judge who has not been afraid of the Clinton justice department, Royce Lambert.
We have just begun to fight. There are more of us who believe the Constitution can keep us free. This is an attack on the Constitution. We need people like you and others whose names and thoughts I've seen on FR to stand up and teach others the real issue. Too bad others, such as WND, with a voice wasted money by focusing on a birth certificate which will never see the light of day. There is nothing to prove. We need to force our judicial system to act on a violation of our Constitution. Politicians may prefer this battle over every socialist issue because it shows they are doing something, and will help the GOP regain the legislature. No legislator who cannot answer the question “what defines a ‘natural born citizen’, the Constitutional eligibility standard for president?” should receive the votes of patriots.
bump
I could be wrong, but isn't it true that once the Supreme Court has ruled, a precedent is set, and lower courts are bound to rule in accordance with that precedent? If a lower court decides in conflict with a Supreme Court ruling, than can't the lower courts decision be overturned?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.