Skip to comments.
Two Options Left, Stop It Ourselves or Revolution
Posted on 03/17/2010 1:30:57 PM PDT by TheNewPatriot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: TheNewPatriot
Don’t hold back. Tell us how you really feel.
2
posted on
03/17/2010 1:31:53 PM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: TheNewPatriot
3
posted on
03/17/2010 1:33:52 PM PDT
by
Kartographer
(".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
To: TheNewPatriot
Unfortunately, you are in the minority.
Most Americans are too focused on getting their brackets right than care what is happening in DC.
Green Day was right for the wrong reasons.
4
posted on
03/17/2010 1:35:54 PM PDT
by
deadrock
(Liberty is a bitch that needs to be bedded on a mattress of cadavers.)
To: TheNewPatriot
Revolutions are used to replace a FORM of government with another form. So, what are you going to institute instead?
If you are just advocating violent removal from office of the current occupants, that's not a revolution. That's rebellion, or a coup.
It's like it says in the Declaration:
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government
I'm all for altering our system. Are you? Otherwise, you are just advocating anarchy.
5
posted on
03/17/2010 1:36:09 PM PDT
by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
To: TheNewPatriot
If a crowd happens to gather in Washington and surround the white house.. I will join them
6
posted on
03/17/2010 1:38:56 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
To: Huck
I believe resetting to original intent counts as altering, abolishing, and instituting a new government because our current government is NOT the one outlined in the Constitution.
7
posted on
03/17/2010 1:39:22 PM PDT
by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system.)
To: TheNewPatriot
8
posted on
03/17/2010 1:41:08 PM PDT
by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: TheNewPatriot
The current regime (and that includes Congress) does need replacing. But that will be a tall order, lest the military is willing to join our side.
A more manageable option is secession.
To: TheNewPatriot
If people haven’t revolted yet, they may never ever revolt.
10
posted on
03/17/2010 1:44:43 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(I said it yesterday and I'll say it today and everyday: Tomorrow I stop being so lazy!!)
To: Domandred
What do you mean by resetting? What would you change?
11
posted on
03/17/2010 1:44:59 PM PDT
by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
To: GeronL
It’s our political caste that is revolting; despicable scum to their core.
12
posted on
03/17/2010 1:46:58 PM PDT
by
Ingtar
(Washington, DC: James 3:16 For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.)
To: Mr. K
Did’nt a Rep.( I think King) say something about a “Velvet Revolution”. ( Don’t know if this would really work).Any way I’m just as frustrated as the everyone else... I had a crazy thought today, that I may be explaining to my children and grandchildren that once upon a time this country had a constitution that our Government went by. Of course it is the Once upon a time that scares me.
13
posted on
03/17/2010 1:49:48 PM PDT
by
kacres
To: Huck
“Revolutions are used to replace a FORM of government with another form.”
Replacing our system with a government of limited powers would in fact be a change in the form of government.
To: ModelBreaker
I agree. The Constitution is a total failure when it comes to limited powers. That’s a proven fact. So, what shall we replace it with?
15
posted on
03/17/2010 1:52:54 PM PDT
by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
To: Huck
Something very similar but with real limits, I would hope.
16
posted on
03/17/2010 1:55:48 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(I said it yesterday and I'll say it today and everyday: Tomorrow I stop being so lazy!!)
To: GeronL
I don’t think you can have both.
17
posted on
03/17/2010 1:58:08 PM PDT
by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
To: Huck
I think we can have individual freedom and limited government, I don’t think those are contradictory.
18
posted on
03/17/2010 1:59:27 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(I said it yesterday and I'll say it today and everyday: Tomorrow I stop being so lazy!!)
To: Mr. K
If a crowd happens to gather in Washington and surround the white house.. I will join themActor Jon Voight is asking all liberty loving Americans to meet up in DC this Saturday, at noon, on the steps of the Capitol.
19
posted on
03/17/2010 2:02:03 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Clean out Congress...give 'em term limits and their own dose of "government" healthcare.)
To: GeronL
We can have those things, but we can’t have limited government under anything similar to our Constitution.
20
posted on
03/17/2010 2:02:31 PM PDT
by
Huck
(Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson