Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Moral Case Against Health Care Reform
The American Thinker ^ | March 23, 2010 | Andrew Foy, MD

Posted on 03/23/2010 4:30:06 AM PDT by Scanian

The greatest expansion of American government and the social welfare state since the Great Society passed the House Sunday night. Opponents recognize that this bill violates the most important principles of American government, and as such, is immoral.

In a free society, does one individual's needs constitute another individual's obligation to provide? The answer is no; rather, it is the duty of free individuals to decide what and whose needs appear most important to them. In a free society, the individual is of supreme importance and should not to be used as a means to society's ends. The individual has the right to order his actions and possessions in the manner most consistent with pursuing his own happiness and values. This view is consistent with America's founding principles. The Declaration of Independence states:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: freedom; individuals; morality; naturalrights; welfarestate

1 posted on 03/23/2010 4:30:06 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson