Posted on 04/09/2010 12:10:16 PM PDT by Elderberry
On April 6, 2010, Dr. Orly Taitz filed an intervener motion to petition the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Florida, to participate in the declaratory judgment action before that court by 13 state Attorneys General. Taitz made her motion as a Plaintiff of Right, or alternatively, with the Court’s permission. The thirteen plaintiffs are suing the Obama regime on the grounds that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the health care bill) violates the Constitution’s Commerce Clause at Article I, Section 8.
However, on April 8, senior federal judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida Roger Vinson denied Taitz’s request for several reasons, stating that “Whether to grant permissive intervention is left to the discretion of the district court.” He also wrote that “the representation by the Attorneys General must be deemed adequate” in regard to their lawsuit against the health care bill.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
They’re attracted to an Orly post like mosquitos to a light
They’re attracted to an Orly post like mosquitos to a light
Orly is an attractant alright, $20,000 worth.
Yeah, that really came out of nowhere...
Looks obvious to me ... on the O-payroll.
Give her some time. She'll probably figure out a way.
obumpa
Oh, come on. If there is any chance at all to overturn the health care bill, do you really want Orly in the mix? Based on her court presentations to date, do you think she has any ability to help? Can you imagine her doing anything but harm?
This is an important issue, and Orly’s antics are a guaranteed fail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.