Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Beckwith; Mr Rogers

Beckwith,

For clarification, are you essentially saying that a law governing the status of one’s citizenship (by blood) equates to that person owing a natural allegiance?

Mr Rogers,

Are you essentially saying that the such a law does not equate to a natural allegiance?

Thanks,
Tex


16 posted on 04/29/2010 10:16:52 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

I’m saying the British law does not impose any natural allegiance on Obama’s part, nor has he ever shown any allegiance in any way to the UK.

Legally, I believe the consensus prior to Obama’s running was that ‘natural born’ meant born in America, versus a naturalized citizen. That may or may not have been the original intent, but the original intent doesn’t seem clear enough for a court to rule Obama ineligible.


19 posted on 04/29/2010 10:41:15 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson