Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Explosive Report Shows Kagan Supports Censorship of TV, Radio, Posters and Pamphlets
Conservative Examiner ^ | 5/11/2010 | Anthony G. Martin

Posted on 05/11/2010 1:06:13 PM PDT by Welshman007

According to an explosive special report on Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's views on the First Amendment right to free speech, in September of 2009 Kagan encouraged the Court to adhere to a new philosophy on the First Amendment that would allow the government to censor posters, pamphlets, and TV and radio content--and the Internet.

(AP Photo/Steven Senne). Liberal elitist minions at Harvard applaud Kagan's nomination.

In a stunning news report issued today by CNS, the following information was disclosed:

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bhofail; elenakagan; freespeech; governmentcensorship

1 posted on 05/11/2010 1:06:14 PM PDT by Welshman007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

And yet the democrats in congress will confirm her.


2 posted on 05/11/2010 1:09:12 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

True, and sadly some Repubs may too.


3 posted on 05/11/2010 1:11:34 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, while you were sleeping the Socialists took over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007
it is clear that the nomination of Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court is intended, in part, to bolster the Obama Administration's intention to censor the Internet, radio and TV, posters and pamphlets, and, as an extension, books

Not shocking nor explosive news. Seems on par with the administration and right on target with the destruction of America.

4 posted on 05/11/2010 1:12:39 PM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

This report would explain why she would be dear leader’s pic!


5 posted on 05/11/2010 1:13:59 PM PDT by bushwon ("If you think healthcare is expensive now, wait till it is free"--PJ O'rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

BTTT for later


6 posted on 05/11/2010 1:16:01 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

And you can BET this won’t be enough to deter Orrin Hatch from supporting her!!!


7 posted on 05/11/2010 1:16:48 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Of course she will be confirmed.

Idiots.


8 posted on 05/11/2010 1:17:58 PM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

She’s a shoe in for McCain’s vote.


9 posted on 05/11/2010 1:25:05 PM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

The Axis of Ivy expands its tenacles.


10 posted on 05/11/2010 1:27:04 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Kaganaroo court.


11 posted on 05/11/2010 1:31:10 PM PDT by spokeshave (They'll get my false teeth when they pry them from my sister's cold, dead mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

But these are just her views. I am certain they won’t interfere when her job is simply to ‘interpret the constitution’. If conservatives would just abandon principles and work for social justice a little more often, they would be, ah, liberals...


12 posted on 05/11/2010 1:31:24 PM PDT by LearnsFromMistakes (Yes, I am happy to see you. But that IS a gun in my pocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I’m sure she’s got Lindsey Grahamnesty’s vote.


13 posted on 05/11/2010 1:45:57 PM PDT by Carpe Cerevisi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

I agree with those who say she is not a shoe in. That if the Rep delay this nomination, in order to make it an election issue. Politicians would have to defend their support of her .


14 posted on 05/11/2010 2:00:08 PM PDT by wmap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I pray that Ginsbarf doesn’t retire in the next year. That would mean 3 liberals barely 50 years old. The GOP would have to pull off a political straight to match that down the road.


15 posted on 05/11/2010 2:02:13 PM PDT by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007

bump


16 posted on 05/11/2010 3:33:43 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007; All
I kepp telling you all what we are really facing here:

 

17 posted on 05/11/2010 3:52:02 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into America's Twilight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns
And yet the democrats in congress will confirm her.

Not all. Bet some think she is too conservative
18 posted on 05/11/2010 4:12:50 PM PDT by RedMonqey (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Welshman007
While she will replace another liberal, there is a HUGE difference in having another liberal and having a RADICAL activist liberal on the court. Too many IMPORTANT cases before the Court boil down to 5-4 decisions. to put a a radical like her on the court would be a disaster.

IF she is willing to eviscerate the First Amendment,( a”sacred” lamb among liberals and conservatives) upon the alter of Political Correctness. imagine what she would do to the Second Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, private property, etc.

Be Afraid. Be very Afraid.....
19 posted on 05/11/2010 4:29:56 PM PDT by RedMonqey (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson