Skip to comments.
Examiner Editorial: Stop providing police escorts to union thugs
San Francisco Examiner ^
| May 24, 2010
| San Francisco Examiner Editorial
Posted on 05/24/2010 10:19:27 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Feckless
Ok where is the picture of Clint with his Garand?”GET OFF MY LAWN”! That would be me. Love my Garand..
21
posted on
05/24/2010 10:49:49 AM PDT
by
crazydad
(What)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Cops can travel around in uniform to other jurisdictions and still be cops. They just don't have authority to enforce minor jurisdiction specific laws. They may enforce state law like assault, murder, kidnapping, robbery, but not a local requirement for a permit to demonstrate.
Clever, no?
22
posted on
05/24/2010 10:50:44 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Navy Patriot
I've read this claim several times. Are there any pictures? Surely someone took pics of the cops escorting the thugs.
23
posted on
05/24/2010 10:50:50 AM PDT
by
TankerKC
(R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
To: Kimberly GG
This is a terrifying scenario. I find it especially disturbing if it is true that local law enforcement arrived but did not act.
24
posted on
05/24/2010 10:53:34 AM PDT
by
bytheBook
(When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: Navy Patriot; All
That’s what happens when the citizens are disarmed. The founders knew what they were doing when they wrote the 2nd Amendment.
25
posted on
05/24/2010 10:54:12 AM PDT
by
KarinG1
(They should put the terror watch list online so we'd know who to drag out and feed to the gators.)
To: Navy Patriot
This was in the SFE? WOW!
26
posted on
05/24/2010 10:58:19 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: MarineBrat
A fire extinguisher filled with 10% sodium hypochlorite should disperse the scum. I suspect so, but it won't do much about the torts filed.
You are responsible for injuries that occur to persons on your property if a jury so decides.
You might note that demonstrators are seldom sprayed with just fire hoses in the US anymore, there IS a reason, torts.
27
posted on
05/24/2010 11:00:08 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Travis McGee
This was in the SFE? WOW!Yep, they are nowhere near the wacko crap that used to be all SF media.
28
posted on
05/24/2010 11:02:33 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: KarinG1
Agreed, the jackboot thug accompaniment was to obstruct 2A.
29
posted on
05/24/2010 11:04:45 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Navy Patriot
Be still my heart! How are they on volunteering for “sancutary” status for illegals, and rolling out the red carpet for panhandlers and bums?
30
posted on
05/24/2010 11:05:52 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: Navy Patriot
It would seem to me that a policeman in uniform, out of jurisdiction, participating in this thuggery, would be civilly liable. Likewise, the city the policeman worked for should also be.
To: Navy Patriot
I agree completely with the criticism of both the union and Washington police. It is ironic that Greg Baer’s political contributions were all to Clinton and Oboma. I suppose the old saying “You should be careful what you ask for because you may get it” might apply to him.
32
posted on
05/24/2010 11:10:54 AM PDT
by
etcb
To: Navy Patriot
If they were on my property, they would be shot...if they were on the sidewalk, I would water my lawn....
33
posted on
05/24/2010 11:13:15 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(They will get my Fishing Rod when they pry it from my cold dead fingers)
To: bytheBook
local law enforcement arrived but did not act. Yes and no.
The locals immediately required the demonstrators to keep moving as required, and as soon as the homeowner arrived and announced "trespassers leave", they required the thugs to leave.
However the thugs did NOT have the required local permit to assemble, so they could have been immediately arrested and required to leave, and were not.
This means the local police brass and politicians are corrupt, and the local cops were just keeping their own jobs safe.
34
posted on
05/24/2010 11:13:21 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Truth29
The only problem with that scenario is that the DC cops (apparently AKA Regime brownshirts) would have fired on you. As Obama loses legitimacy more and more force will be employed. Since they are outside their jurisdiction (in another state), are they considered cops, or just thugs with guns? If the latter, and they are illegally on your property while armed, or firing at you while you are defending yourself from a mob, may they be engaged like any other armed assailant?
35
posted on
05/24/2010 11:15:20 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
To: Navy Patriot
The Chronicle is the MSM San Francisco newspaper, now. The Examiner got bought up by a religion-friendly philanthropist, Philip Anschultz who funded, “The Chronicles of Narnia” movies, and is now a national tabloid newspaper chain.
36
posted on
05/24/2010 11:16:24 AM PDT
by
dangus
To: Navy Patriot
I love liberty more than security. And sitting in a jail cell as a political prisoner is better than walking the streets as one. If leftist scum attack the front of my house, I’ll fill one of my 2 gallon stainless extinguishers with liquid chlorine from the pool and let them have it... nothing held back. Well, yes, I’ve held back the lead. I don’t want to make martyrs, just ugly bastards with burned eyes.
37
posted on
05/24/2010 11:19:41 AM PDT
by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
It would seem to me that a policeman in uniform, out of jurisdiction, participating in this thuggery, would be civilly liable. Likewise, the city the policeman worked for should also be.You haven't been paying attention in class (or court).
38
posted on
05/24/2010 11:20:46 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: dangus
Yes and sort of. It’s what Hearst owns now that counts.
39
posted on
05/24/2010 11:22:54 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
To: Navy Patriot
No jurisprudential endeavorer, I.
Maybe someone who progressed beyond the LSAT could comment...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson