[mojitojoe]

[noinfringers]

I think the info alluded to is correct and valid. However, SCOTUS and especially Roberts has a lot of crow to eat especially the photo of being palsy-walsy with Obama in SCOTUS chambers where Obama seems to be telling SCOTUS members present that he is the big honcho but we are all buddies. I think this was even before the election- could be wrong on the date.

[little jeremiah]

I really, really like this part especially:

“Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.”

[mo]

Naaah...’Bammy’s the best thing to hit DC and the Rinocratic Party since the New Deal....he’s not goin’ ANYWHERE until 20016. He IS their boy.

somebody tell Lucy to get outa here with her football!!!

[Terry Mross]

And when the SC rules against him you’ll hear him quoting Andrew Jackson.

[gunnyg]

yesseree!

http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2010/07/11/i-like-the-following-part-the-best-dick-g/

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

ping

[Clinging Bitterly]

I'm sayin’ USSC’s not gonna do anything to Obama ‘til someone actually sues him. Someone with standing to do so (another branch of government, for example). Now, since that court has held that the fedgov can regulate virtually anything, even with a good legal case I don't see much happening.

The next two elections are the only “smackdowns” I see on the horizon. And it it very important that in those two elections, WE DELIVER THEM, and not wait for some court to do it.

[decisis]

Brain removed?

[Cyber Ninja]

Pinging me...

[PhatHead]

“Sources”?

[El Gato]

he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.

The First Amendment does not "grant" anything. It protects rights. Rights come from Nature's God, not from the Constitution.

It does say, "the people have the right..", it says "Congress shall make no law.." Just like the Second Amendment, which does not say "the people shall have the right to keep and bear arms", rather is says "..the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".