Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue.
This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
~~~~~~~~~
Be still my heart ..
This would be an EXCELLENT time for Republicans to stall further Obama appointments to ALL Federal judgeship.
How does adherence to the constitution become a ‘smack down’.
This is a ridiculous premise.
Obamacare is squarely in the Court’s pervue. The author sets out the law’s basic flaw well.
However the president’s qualifications to hold office are affirmed by the electoral college and not some court. The Constitution sets forth the only ways a president may be removed: Expiration of his term of office, Impeachment in the Senate, and Death or Resignation allowing the VP to take office. Whatever his personal opinions, anyone expecting Roberts to issue a cease and desist order telling Obama to vacate the White House is kidding himself.
As for Holder, he is an Executive Branch officer. Separation of Powers most likely will shield him.
One comment in particular is flawed:
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.
As much as I understand the abuse of the Commerce Clause argument with respect to buttressing Obamacare, it is not that clause that will save it. It is the 16th Amendment that will allow it.
Obamacare is not a Commerce argument, it is a tax argument. As I have bleated since March 21 of this year, and have confirmed, Obama will have his lawyers defend Obamacare, just as FDR's lawyers defended Social Security, as a tax. The 16th Amendment allows Obama to impose a tax in just about any manner he chooses.
Remember, there are the PUBLIC arguments, and then there are the LEGAL arguments, and they are not necessarily the same.
Obama's lawyers will present their LEGAL arguments by claiming that Obamacare forces no one to purchase health insurance, that instead it recommends 'minimum standards' of health insurance, and those that have proof of 'minimum standard health coverage' will receive a tax credit, others will pay the tax,
The SCOTUS will not be able to strike Obamacare down on a tax argument even if they rule that the Commerce Clause does not support Obamacare,
So the answer to preventing the forward progress of socialism is to REPEAL the 16th Amendment.
Here is a tax code replacement movement:
For decades, the Left has wanted socialized medicine, and they always had the law behind them (tax law). But they never could get the votes in Congress until March 21, 2010.
Wake up! It is the 16th that allows the Left to advance socialism in America!
Yeah, well...all sound wonderful, but dream on.
I do believe there is a legal action that can be imposed upon Obama thats not quite as severe as an impeachment but would still probably lead to one, I think its called censorship.
I am waiting for someone to add some detail but I also think what it leads to is that basically the POTUS is placed in a disciplinary position, on restriction and has to go up for review, now whether its done publicly is another matter but I believe its been done many times, but behind closed Whitehouse doors.
When the Supreme Court rules against one of Obama’s policies I expect that it will be because it’s unconstitutional and not because of any political agenda on the part of the justices.
BUMP for later reading.
Well, I’d like to ask them:
WHAT DA HECK HAVE YOU BEEN WAITING FOR?!?!?!
This could very well be why Obama and Michelle (at the NAACP convention) are ginning up the racial flogging and division in the country.
I witnessed all the racial initiatives starting in the 50’s and forward across the decades. I have never seen such racial division promoted and fostered by any administration in the USA.
He has an agenda to use race and it is going to be very ugly if he continues to use the divide and conquer strategy by race-baiting.
I pray that Obama is impeached and tried for treason.
Ping
I think Obama said what he said about the Supreme Court because in his arrogance he figured they would be intimidated and let his stuff pass.
Whoo Hoo!!
‘wishin an hopin’