Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ASOC
Getting permission - in writing - is required if you ever hope to sell the photos. And you should have it for private use as well.

Buildings/property are now protected by copyright law - for sale or not.


That's exactly why I stick to scenic and floral photography.
24 posted on 07/22/2010 3:56:26 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
Oddly, I have never had any problems - I carry a standard release form in my camera bag (a stack actually) and all that is required is a signature.

Private home owners are a crap shoot. I do my best to hide the address if film, blur the address if digital.

Most folks are happy that thier business will wind up in a Nationally published magazine.
I make a point shooting several frames with the business sign as an obvious part of the photo. Rarely does the editor choose to use those, but I cannot help that.

If I am going to be back in the area I will drop a copy of the magazine to the outfit. Sometimes the publisher will send a copy or two for me.

Other times, businesses will send you good quality photos/images/slides with a release for use in an article. Commercial photography can be pretty cool at times - I once got a personal tour of Hoover Dam into areas the public is normally not allowed for a photo shoot - another, the AKRR let me shoot thier maintenance areas, normally off limits. I love 'big machines' so it was both fun and profit. You might see if there are opporunities in your area.

25 posted on 07/22/2010 9:43:11 AM PDT by ASOC (Alpha India Alpha Three Tango Alpha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson