Skip to comments.Good news: Newsweek sold — for a dollar (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
Posted on 08/02/2010 3:42:34 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Technically its a dollar plus an agreement to assume their huge financial liabilities, but if you throw me an opportunity for a headline that sweet, Im going to take it every time.
Hopefully, in a few years and with a few trillion more tacked onto the national debt, the U.S. can get a deal like this from China.
According to several people who have been briefed on the process, Mr. Harmans bid appealed to Mr. Graham and the Post Company because Mr. Harman has said he would retain a significant number of the magazines 325 employees.
The financial details of the sale were not known, though one person with knowledge of Mr. Harmans bid said last week that he would pay $1 in exchange for absorbing Newsweeks considerable financial liabilities.
Newsweek has struggled through the recession more than most weekly news magazines, losing nearly $30 million last year alone. It was earning that much a year as recently as 2007.
And the longer it remained on the market, the less tenable its financial situation became. It has been an expensive product for the Post Company to produce, with its various international editions and separate back-office positions that were specific to the magazine. Instead of sharing a general counsel and accounting staff with the Post Company, for example, Newsweek has its own employees in those positions.
Business types will, I hope, correct me in the comments, but the fact that the Post is willing to give the mag away in exchange for wiping its hands of the debt means theyre not real optimistic about Newsweek turning a profit in the future, yes? Meanwhile, another intriguing wrinkle: Jon Meacham, the magazines editor and a guy known for praising it in odd, quasi-lyrical terms, will not be among those staying on.
Jon Meacham will announce his departure as editor of Newsweek magazine Monday, at the same time that The Washington Post Co. declares Dr. Sidney Harman, husband of Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), winner of a bidding war for the 77-year-old newsweekly, according to sources inside the company.
Meacham, 41, had been planning to leave no matter who bought the magazine, the sources said
Harman, 91, a wealthy industrialist-turned-philanthropist, is interested in enhancing his legacy by buying a symbol of Washington and global influence, the sources said. In Washington, he was the benefactor of the Shakespeare Theatre Companys Harman Center for the Arts.
So unless Im missing something, what happened here is that Harman wanted a trophy to attest to his own Beltway influence, and since hes already in the habit of charity, he realized he could buy one on the cheap and keep a few hundred people employed in a tough economy. No wonder, then, according to Politico, that he plans to keep the serious-minded, essentially New-Democratic tone Meacham set for the magazine. If hes not interested in the actual content of the magazine or even turning a profit, why would he change things? As for Meachams departure, Ill give you three theories. One: As noted at the link above, hes super busy at the moment writing two presidential biographies and really was planning to leave. Two: He wanted to continue with the magazine that much seems clear to me per the aforementioned lyricism but was miffed when he couldnt put together a winning purchase bid like he had hoped to do. Three: Whoever will now be running the magazine for Harman (hes 91) actually does want to change Newsweeks editorial direction and figured that having Meacham there would simply be an obstacle to that. I hope theory threes the correct one, as it would open the door to my fondest wish for the magazine: A tabloid reboot.
All goofs aside, they do still churn out stuff occasionally that I find interesting, particularly on foreign-policy subjects where their leftish tilt isnt quite as acute. This piece over the weekend interviewing Taliban commanders about who really runs the Afghan insurgency hint: the initials are I-S-I is useful information, and has enough sexy details (some Taliban think Mullah Omar might be in Pakistani custody, a rumor weve heard before) to keep things moving. More of this and less of Fareed Zakaria writing love letters to higher taxes and theyll be back on track.
Update: A national treasure?
NEWSWEEK is a national treasure, Harman said in the news release. I am enormously pleased to be succeeding The Washington Post Company and the Graham family and look forward to this great journalistic, business, and technological challenge. Harman also said, Ill consider it a victory when it breaks even. Onward to victory!
“Harman, 91, a wealthy industrialist-turned-philanthropist”
Wonder how much input his demo-rat wife will have? Is this really a gov’t take over?
John ; Billybob
Suspect it will be more than less, so Newsweak will move slowly leftward from it's current leftist bias.
Newsweek sold for a buck? The buyer ovepaid.
I’m going on the record, right here, right now, that I am willing to go $2 for the NYT.
As long as he fires Eleanor Cliff.
And Evan Thomas - or does he work for Time? I can’t tell one lying weekly political rag from another.
They can't go away fast enough!
Didn’t even know that Newsweak was still in print. I think their highwater mark was putting Bruce Springsteen on the cover back in 1975 - it was all downhill from there (and they were already at sea level).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.