Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ganesha

But your only refutation of Sekulow’s argument is to say that if the arson burns your house down, you have to step back and let the neighborhood busybodies build what they think is a tribute to themselves where your house was.

Just slow down and think carefully about it—you’re the ridiculous statist.


10 posted on 08/04/2010 4:34:04 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Rules will never work for radicals because they seek chaos. And don't even know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

No, as Mayor Bloomberg pointed out the islamic community center is being built on private property according to the wishes of the owner of the land.

Sekulow is asking the government to prohibit a private landowner from building what he wants on his own land.

His justification is that the criminal act which destroyed the previous structure was a “historic event” and that this gives the government the right to prohibit the landowner from rebuilding whatever he chooses on his own land.

Sekulow is the one making a nonsensical statist argument.


12 posted on 08/04/2010 8:42:20 PM PDT by ganesha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson