Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did The Gulf Oil Spill Pull A Houdini?
The Looking Spoon ^ | 8-5-2010 | Jared H. McAndersen

Posted on 08/05/2010 10:18:56 PM PDT by The Looking Spoon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: The Looking Spoon

If anything they’re hiding the fact that they missed the window to clean the vast majority of it with skimmers—and missing that window is entirely the fault of the Obama administration.


21 posted on 08/06/2010 3:11:39 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Looking Spoon

The effect of the spill is a crisis on hold for the time it is needed for a powerful political distraction. I’m sure several narratives have already been prepped for effectiveness.


22 posted on 08/06/2010 3:23:35 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Simple. the president wanted this to go away fast.....


23 posted on 08/06/2010 4:48:26 AM PDT by gulfcoast6 (GOD IS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

The dispersants breakdown faster than the oil and speed the breakdown of the oil to months instead of years.

The dispersants are not new or unknown. We have been using the on oil spills for many years. The difference this time was the volume and applying directly at the spill source underwater allowing them to begin breaking down the oil sooner.

If not applied underwater, the oil would have spread even farther before reaching the surface nearly a mile up. This would have made it far more difficult to treat while so greatly spread out.


24 posted on 08/06/2010 5:37:21 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

interesting...thanks for sharing this


25 posted on 08/06/2010 6:31:12 AM PDT by adventistanswers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The Looking Spoon

More info on oil breaking down:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2565351/posts


26 posted on 08/06/2010 7:06:05 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine; thackney

Thanks for the info. I heard the dispersants were very toxic so it was a concern that they were putting so much into the water. It’s hard to know what to believe these days with so much propaganda and political agendas going on. I hope to goodness that nature is taking care of things like they are saying.


27 posted on 08/06/2010 10:40:37 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Plus it is light oil. It will take a while but it will be ok. I bet they end up tapping the well at the bottom and getting production out of it.


28 posted on 08/06/2010 10:53:21 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Looking Spoon

It doesn’t change the ratio because it is minute compared to the other sources of oil in the waterways. The Ixtoc 1 well blowout was included in the figures that went into that chart and it released far more oil than the Deepwater Horizon blowout.


29 posted on 08/06/2010 12:40:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
If anything they’re hiding the fact that they missed the window to clean the vast majority of it with skimmers—and missing that window is entirely the fault of the Obama administration.

That is exactly right. The one thing that could have been done was to put all efforts into protecting the shorelines and it needed to be done immediately not 50 days after the blowout began. 0bozo not only didn't do that he let the Coast Guard and other Fed agencies block state and private efforts to do that.

30 posted on 08/06/2010 12:45:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: adventistanswers

Thank you. Glad to do it.


31 posted on 08/06/2010 12:47:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson