Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CynicalBear

Maybe Justice Roberts saw it at the second, closed-to-the-press inaugural swearing-in.


77 posted on 08/06/2010 3:17:15 PM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: silverleaf

If he saw it, which it is most unlikely, so what? Justice Roberts is not a document examiner. If they even presented such a thing to him at that time, that itself would be strong evidence of a con job. Cons do present fraudulent docs in situations and times when they unlikely to be fully reviewed, or even when they can not be rejected except at great political cost or loss of face.


78 posted on 08/06/2010 3:21:59 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: silverleaf

What if when the Repubs take over the house in November, they will be in control of committees. Can they not subpoena Chief Justice Roberts to testify to what exactly did Barry swear as he took the oath of office the second time after flubbing it in public? Did Barry ever properly swear to the oath of office? Is that why he is shredding the Constitutional because he never actually swore to uphold it? Just sayin...


79 posted on 08/06/2010 3:39:04 PM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 ("People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook. Well, I'm not a crook")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson