Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Soebarkah” most likely name given to Obama upon adoption by Indonesian Stepfather
The Post and Email ^ | August 5 2010 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 08/06/2010 11:10:44 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009

The Post & Email has made contact with a highly credible individual who was born and raised in Indonesia.

Here he explains the significance of the term “Soebarkah,” which first appeared to the American public on July 29, 2010

on passport application forms released by the Bureau of Customs and Border Control to Mr. Christopher Strunk, who had filed a lawsuit in November 2008 after his FOIA request was denied.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; certificate; certifigate; christopherstrunk; foia; hawaii; naturalborncitizen; obama; passport; soebarkah; soetoro; strunk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last
To: DontTreadOnMe2009
That and the fact that his mother was a slut...
61 posted on 08/06/2010 12:53:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

The threat of it could have affected him.

More likely, he thought he did not need to sign up.

The SS card he has shown seems to be doctored to show that he did, as is needed for political success, sign up in 1980 as an American would, when in reality he did not, waiting to sign up until 2008.

Or so the speculation goes after someone got ahold of his records.

Again, who knows with this guy.

If he has nothing to hide why not just release all the records if they truthfully reflect what he has been telling everyone for 6 years now.

Or does everyone think he hides them all since so few records reflect the myth he has built up around himself.?


62 posted on 08/06/2010 12:54:09 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

The draft ended in 1973...

But we must still all still sign up

Hell -—Charlie Rangel wants to draft us ALL right now today.


63 posted on 08/06/2010 12:55:28 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: republicangel

What bothers me is that so many on the right have accepted the MSM’s propaganda that anyone who asks such questions is crazy. Obviously, something is being hidden. It’s quite sane to explore this issue.


64 posted on 08/06/2010 12:58:37 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: daku
A Boy Named Soe.
65 posted on 08/06/2010 12:59:22 PM PDT by Cheburashka (Stephen Decatur: You want barrels of gunpowder as tribute, you must expect cannonballs with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Those pics are the only ones where she has short hair.


66 posted on 08/06/2010 12:59:36 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

Being a female, I didn’t have to register for the draft so I’m at a loss. Was registration still necessary after it ended?


67 posted on 08/06/2010 1:01:58 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Yes

Just in case.

And still is today I believe.


68 posted on 08/06/2010 1:03:42 PM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

So................as a “foreign” student he wouldn’t have had to register.


69 posted on 08/06/2010 1:06:24 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

Fact: It is a simple matter to prove that one is a natural born citizen.

Fact: Obama has gone to considerable effort and spent tax dollars and his own to prevent the release of the common documents that would prove ( or disprove) his natural born status.

Fact: A natural born president would be **HONORED** to promptly prove ( with the **best** evidence) to any soldier or citizen that he was indeed natural born and eligible to be president and Commander in Chief.

Conclusion: That Obama has treated military officers and citizens in the manner that he has, strongly indicates that he is a usurper.


70 posted on 08/06/2010 1:14:09 PM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009

If he was adopted by Soetoro and went to Indonesian schools he had to have been an Indonesian citizen. He also could not have been an American citizen at that point because Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship at that time. He also, probably, was using an Indonesian passport in 1981 when he took the trip to Pakistan because Americans where not allowed to travel in Pakistan in 1981.


71 posted on 08/06/2010 1:19:12 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Actually we really don’t know what his true name is do we? Has anyone really seen a legal document that proves what his name really is??


72 posted on 08/06/2010 1:24:36 PM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DontTreadOnMe2009
Fact: It is a simple matter to prove that one is a natural born citizen.

Fact: Obama has gone to considerable effort and spent tax dollars and his own to prevent the release of the common documents that would prove ( or disprove) his natural born status.

Fact: A natural born president would be **HONORED** to promptly prove ( with the **best** evidence) to any soldier or citizen that he was indeed natural born and eligible to be president and Commander in Chief.

Conclusion: That Obama has treated military officers and citizens in the manner that he has, strongly indicates that he is a usurper.

73 posted on 08/06/2010 1:27:38 PM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

ping


74 posted on 08/06/2010 1:32:55 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Utopia is being foisted on Americans for their own good.-- J. Robert Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

US citizens were allowed to travel to Pakistan at that time. There were warnings of some kind but travel was not forbidden.


75 posted on 08/06/2010 2:08:39 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: albie

If you’re questioned by SS, just tell them: SOB = Steve Or Barak!


76 posted on 08/06/2010 2:37:22 PM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

Maybe Justice Roberts saw it at the second, closed-to-the-press inaugural swearing-in.


77 posted on 08/06/2010 3:17:15 PM PDT by silverleaf (Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

If he saw it, which it is most unlikely, so what? Justice Roberts is not a document examiner. If they even presented such a thing to him at that time, that itself would be strong evidence of a con job. Cons do present fraudulent docs in situations and times when they unlikely to be fully reviewed, or even when they can not be rejected except at great political cost or loss of face.


78 posted on 08/06/2010 3:21:59 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

What if when the Repubs take over the house in November, they will be in control of committees. Can they not subpoena Chief Justice Roberts to testify to what exactly did Barry swear as he took the oath of office the second time after flubbing it in public? Did Barry ever properly swear to the oath of office? Is that why he is shredding the Constitutional because he never actually swore to uphold it? Just sayin...


79 posted on 08/06/2010 3:39:04 PM PDT by AlexisHeavyMetal1981 ("People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook. Well, I'm not a crook")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The word “butterface” comes to mind! (everything but her face!)


80 posted on 08/06/2010 3:39:28 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson