I appreciate the offer, but the science is way above my pay grade. I’d probably have to study the paper for a week or more and I still likely wouldn’t understand most of the equations etc. even if it was written in perfect English. I get the “gist” of his argument in the same way I get the “gist” of string theory. Were I asked to defend or explain either in a court of law, it would be well beyond my capabilities.
So I commend Dr. Z on his work, but the people he needs to educate/convince are the climate scientists who now are spreading disinformation. Hopefully having this paper in a peer-reviewed journal will facilitate that objective.
That was the overall intention. And to inform the public in understandable language to apply pressure in that very direction. Even James Hansen’s former boss at NASA has come out and denounced AGW.
The tide is turning.
It has taken me a year to really understand this stuff, and I have only just scratched the surface of it.