To: Man50D
No. He is unequivocally NOT a Natural Born Citizen. He was born British and American (assuming he was actually born in Hawaii, if he wasn’t then he is British). He never was and never could have been a Natural Born Citizen based on parentage from the instant he was conceived.
4 posted on
08/15/2010 11:05:57 AM PDT by
Danae
(Anal nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do che'l de'nmha.)
To: Danae
15 posted on
08/15/2010 11:14:56 AM PDT by
Eagles6
( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck.)
To: Danae
No. He is unequivocally NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Until the long form birth certificate is produced we really do NOT know who his father is.
Yes, Obama is claiming that Obama Sr. is his father, but we do not know that for certain.
I'm in the camp that says his citizenship and his natural birth status can not be proven either for or against because there simply is too much missing in the way of documentation and witnesses.
41 posted on
08/15/2010 11:52:47 AM PDT by
wintertime
(Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
To: Danae
No. He is unequivocally NOT a Natural Born Citizen. He was born British and American (assuming he was actually born in Hawaii, if he wasn’t then he is British). He never was and never could have been a Natural Born Citizen based on parentage from the instant he was conceived.Double plus good. This is the argument we should stress.
50 posted on
08/15/2010 12:07:10 PM PDT by
WhirlwindAttack
(Soon I will disappear. Time to go offgrid and underground. Go Galt now, go Bowman later.)
To: Danae
YOu want to know something; you probably already do but here goes. Nobody in the media wants to debate this. Right, left or center nobody will debate this. It is a sad and very frustrating as Patriotic American to see this.
74 posted on
08/15/2010 1:33:28 PM PDT by
rambo316
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson