Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner to the rich: don’t blame me. If you like your money, stop funding the Democrats!
Big Bureaucracy ^ | September 13th, 2010 | Ellie Velinska

Posted on 09/13/2010 7:59:14 AM PDT by Big Bureaucracy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: HerrBlucher

> “Cmon editor, you know dang well that this is true, people love the envy of others more than actual wealth”

.
That is true for some, but most of them do not last long. Their nature gets the best of them quickly.
.


41 posted on 09/13/2010 9:20:36 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

If you are not happy with Boehner challenge him in a primary.


42 posted on 09/13/2010 9:23:31 AM PDT by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Big Bureaucracy
Here comes the Boehner’s genius: rich democrats talk class warfare only because they believe the Republicans are there to protect their success. If the Republicans give up and let the radical left President run wild without a check – all those rich democrats will have to walk the walk to IRS, not only talk the talk.

Maybe Boehner is smarter than I had given him credit for, or maybe he's just catching on.

I've been trying to tell people for many years that there are very few conservatives as executives or management in corporations, and even less in NGOs, academia, hollywood, government agencies at all levels. The commies having been "seizing the wealth" long before Obama showed up.

43 posted on 09/13/2010 9:34:05 AM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

“there are very few conservatives as executives or management in corporations, and even less in NGOs, academia, hollywood, government agencies at all levels. The commies having been “seizing the wealth” long before Obama showed up.”

You are so right. The Bush tax-cuts for the ‘wealthy’ will hit lots of democratic elitists that make between 250K and 400K - about all of the PhDs behind fancy college desks fall in this category. Democrats are the ones that fill many sweet and well paid bureaucratic jobs.


44 posted on 09/13/2010 9:56:01 AM PDT by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
Would that mean if your net worth is negative, they send you a check?

Probably not in your case, but O has given it some thought:

…the Earned Income Tax Credit provides… income through the tax code …(it) should be expanded…so more families can take advantage of it.
2006
The Audacity of Hope, p.283

45 posted on 09/13/2010 9:57:16 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Wake up America! You are losing the war against your families and your Constitution!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

Also don’t forget the local bureaucracies - remember that California mayor with the 6 digits salary?


46 posted on 09/13/2010 10:02:17 AM PDT by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

Obama calls the expanding of the Earned Income Tax Credit a ‘tax-cut’. This is a travesty. Through EIC folks that don’t own taxes receive check of thousands of dollars.

Also they transformed the ‘workfare” into community jobs. Workfare did not count as income for EIC - so they transformed it into salaries so the workfare (street sweeping etc) can collect EIC bonus trough the tax-code on their workfare.


47 posted on 09/13/2010 10:06:58 AM PDT by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
Now you could talk about the theoretical tax that Obama's crowd floated not long ago to tax net worth every year to the tune of about 2%. That would leave a mark.

THAT is an interesting statement. Do you have a confirmed source? The reason that's so terribly interesting is that this would replicate the Islamic Sharia tax scheme of zakat, which is a 2.5% tax on net worth.

48 posted on 09/13/2010 11:43:22 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
Maybe Boehner is smarter than I had given him credit for, or maybe he's just catching on.

What he actually said was:

"If the only option I have is to vote for those at [$250,000] and below, of course I'm going to do that," Boehner said. "But I'm going to do everything I can to fight to make sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans."
The Democrats want the Republicans to fight for "tax cuts for the rich", so they have something to beat the Pubbies with in attack ads just before the election. What Boehner is doing is to tell the Dems: "You want it? You got it. We will just vote "present" and let you pass it, and get all the credit for it. See how well your rich constituents like you now."
49 posted on 09/13/2010 12:09:46 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: geologist

According to the Constitution, the people have a right “to petition their government” and lobbyists are just agents for the people.


50 posted on 09/13/2010 12:15:52 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Many lobbyists are representing major corporations which are not necessarily for the people, or of the people.

Like all things it is possible to corrupt the intended process. Bribes given and accepted does not make for a government of the people. MO

Tom Daschle and his wife, that was a lobbyist for the airlines and the legislation that was proposed and passed during their time EI.

Theoretically, it is legal; and it is definitely a conflict of intersts.

Just one instance among thousands.

51 posted on 09/14/2010 8:26:46 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: geologist

Everyone knows about Daschle and his wife, but if actual bribes can’t be proved, lobbyists are a legal and Constitutionally protected part of the process. Just like the boogeyman issue of PACs and the dreaded “earmarks”, they’re all phony issues that have been created as a political smokescreen to deflect from the real horror of Democrat ruled America.


52 posted on 09/14/2010 11:35:11 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Deb

My point is lobbyist have too must leeway and take up too much of the legislators time. There needs to be some policies, rules, and definition of what is legal behavior and a bit more control of their apparently immense power to sway the legislators. MO

It has become more powerful than the wishes of the people. and very enriching to the legislators too, I might add.


53 posted on 09/15/2010 7:51:22 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson