Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385; mkjessup; Gilbo_3

I was beginning to wonder if Angle was pulling a John McCain.....lose on purpose.


35 posted on 10/07/2010 10:23:03 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: stephenjohnbanker; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; DoughtyOne; rabscuttle385; mkjessup; Gilbo_3; ...
RE :” I was beginning to wonder if Angle was pulling a John McCain.....lose on purpose.

You would have been happy if he tried to lose against JD on purpose.

I always thought JMcC was trying to win in 2008.

Think of it this way. In 2008 McCain and the Republicans had one main argument, it was :”We may suck but Democrats are so terrible you HAVE to vote for us. You have no choice”. And to most here that appeared to be a great argument, Obama was the lower threshold of acceptability.

This 2010 election the voters are fed up with Democrats, many willing to vote R instead D . So what is democrats main argument? : “We may suck but Republicans/Tea party candidates are so terrible you HAVE to vote for us. You have no choice”. WOW, I have heard this argument before someplace.

As Chris Matthews concluded when he was reflecting on the likely voters response to this Democrat strategy :”You think I don't have a choice?? You watch me vote and see if I don't.

The Democrats on MSNBC talking points now go : “The voters are too smart to fall for Republicans and vote against us”. Weren't Republicans claiming the same thing in 2008?

36 posted on 10/07/2010 12:53:34 PM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson