Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Prepares to Surrender in Afghanistan
The Silent Majority ^ | 10-21-10 | J.D. Longstreet

Posted on 10/22/2010 7:58:07 AM PDT by Lexluthor69

In an article entitled “Iran joins high-level Afghan talks” by AP writer ALESSANDRA RIZZO, Rizzo says the following: “Iran took part in a high-level meeting on Afghanistan on Monday after the United States said it has no problem with its participation.

The international “contact group” met in Rome amid a renewed push to end the nine-year-old war in Afghanistan, including bringing Taliban into peace talks. The group gathers the Afghan government, NATO, the EU, U.N. and other key players — including Iran this time — to assess progress in Afghanistan.

Representatives attending the talks said Iran was invited as part of efforts to have a comprehensive approach and include regional players in the discussions over the future of Afghanistan.

Richard Holbrooke, U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said Washington was asked about possible Iranian involvement and responded it had no problem with it. He and other representatives stressed the talks are limited to Afghanistan and do not touch on the contentious issue of Tehran’s nuclear dossier.

“This is a meeting on Afghanistan and it is restricted to Afghanistan,” Holbrooke told reporters. “What we are discussing here is not affected by, nor will it affect, the bilateral issues that are discussed elsewhere regarding Iran.” (SOURCE)

What all this tells THIS scribe is – that Obama is looking for a way, anyway, to pull US Forces out of Afghanistan, at the earliest possible moment, and any progress that has been made in Afghanistan, at the cost of all those American’s lives, will have been in vain!

(Excerpt) Read more at silentmajority09.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; iran; obama; surrender

1 posted on 10/22/2010 7:58:10 AM PDT by Lexluthor69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lexluthor69

Why is this a big deal? It is merely an immitation of Bush’s strategy of buying off the insurgents.


2 posted on 10/22/2010 8:00:14 AM PDT by Captain Kirk (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexluthor69
Today Afghanistan, tomorrow Israel.
3 posted on 10/22/2010 8:00:14 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexluthor69; DarthVader

beyond stupid


4 posted on 10/22/2010 8:01:31 AM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexluthor69

It is getting pretty obvious that pulling out of Afghanistan is his re-election campaign bid.

Plus its better for our troops since his RoE’s and letting the bad guys go “to encourage the Taliban into talks” is just going to get more of our guys killed.


5 posted on 10/22/2010 8:01:42 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
Why is this a big deal? It is merely an immitation of Bush’s strategy of buying off the insurgents.

Bush didn't set a date certain for withdrawal. That's the critical issue.

6 posted on 10/22/2010 8:03:19 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lexluthor69
Everyone inevitably “surrenders” in Afghanistan.

The place is the anus of the earth, even the Afghans “surrender”. Every power that has tried to impose an semblance of order there has failed.

Later this century, after we evacuate, China will get its shot at the tittle.

Decades later, they likewise will “surrender”, just like the rest.

There are better methods of obtaining sand than banging your head on a rock.

7 posted on 10/22/2010 8:14:07 AM PDT by mmercier (War without tears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Just out of curiosity..

Do you think it appropriate that the US military guarantee an unending commitment to try and reign in a piece of real estate that only goats, and people tougher than goats, inhabit...?

Do you believe that Afghanistan is capable of threatening the US today...?

Seeing as we have blown the crap out of any moving target bigger than a breadbox for a decade should we start targeting the mice...?.

Things still move there, should we remain till we get them all..?.

How many of our people should we waste there, and for how long...?

To what end...?

8 posted on 10/22/2010 8:43:18 AM PDT by mmercier (heaven knows what we have to prove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

All those lost and shattered lives and national treasure expended, for this?

God help us all.


9 posted on 10/22/2010 8:48:44 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk

“Why is this a big deal? It is merely an immitation of Bush’s strategy of buying off the insurgents.”

exactly.

You will catch slack on FR, but in a parallel universe where John F’n McCain is the POTUS... the CiC would still be implementing a staged withdrawal. McCain and Sarah Palin don’t want their sons to die in F’ing Marjah Afghanistan. Even there their only control less than 40% oof the zone... huge tracks of land the size of Connecticut have never had a ISAF presence in that Marjah area... and The USMC zone is the only zone where pacification is occurring, and the USMC brass are hated for their success by the other branches of the US Military and the 21 other allied armed forces in the country.

When Roggio and Yon both come out forcefully repeating their belief Afghanistan can not be won through occupation... well I’ll side with them over armchair generals in the FR peanut gallery.


10 posted on 10/22/2010 10:02:03 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

I understand your points, but the propaganda and recruiting value of our defeat would be of untold magnitude for the enemy.


11 posted on 10/22/2010 1:17:42 PM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson