Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC:You Know Palin’s Latest Video Shows She’s Still Shallow But Oh So Cunning..
Conservatives4Palin ^ | 5/10/10 | the Aged P

Posted on 11/05/2010 7:59:49 AM PDT by sussex

Of course there is an element of snark in this BBC piece on the latest Palin video but there is also a reluctant admission "It is one minute and nine seconds of pure advertising genius - a dazzling calling card from the woman who, most now agree, wants to be president."

(Excerpt) Read more at conservatives4palin.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bbc; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2010 7:59:54 AM PDT by sussex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sussex

After Tuesday’s showing of a weak candidate (O’Donnell) and a stronger candidate (Angle), can we please pick someone other than Palin in 2012? It wasn’t their principles that lost - as pure conservatives won elsewhere (Toomey), but the candidates themselves who lost.

I love her policies and her principles. But I don’t want to brainwash myself into thinking she’s electable merely because she’s conservative like we did with O’Donnell and Angle. I talk to too many people who want Obama out who say they couldn’t vote for her. I know, the plural of anecdote is not data, but I think we, as conservatives, should take Tuesday’s election as a lesson.


2 posted on 11/05/2010 8:04:14 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sussex

Socialist country full of rotten teeth and sharia law... yep... I am going to listen to them.

LLS


3 posted on 11/05/2010 8:08:20 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sussex

No doubt about it.. that ad is brilliant.. You betcha..


4 posted on 11/05/2010 8:09:20 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Give me a break.

I suppose you want another Bob Dole.


5 posted on 11/05/2010 8:10:18 AM PDT by stevestras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Women hate women, or the queen bee syndrome if you like. That is why liberal or even moderate women heads might explode when the subject of Sarah Palin comes up.

Sarah is 46 years old. She may do best to take the Secretary State position in 2012, which will set up a run for the Presidency in 2020. She will be 56 then.


6 posted on 11/05/2010 8:11:03 AM PDT by frithguild (The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Who is this “we” you refer to?

Sarah Palin isn’t a candidate, but if she becomes one, that’s what Primaries are for.


7 posted on 11/05/2010 8:11:59 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Hey the nra supported. Are you sure you support the nra?


8 posted on 11/05/2010 8:13:03 AM PDT by DWC (historian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stevestras

You caught me.

Got anything educated to say?


9 posted on 11/05/2010 8:13:07 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sussex
You Know Palin’s Latest Video Shows She’s Still Shallow But Oh So Cunning..

It is not how "complex" or "simple" you are that makes you the best leader. It's which direction you are heading.

Over complicated solutions are usually an indication that you don't understand the problem.

"If you have to force it, you're doing it the wrong way."

10 posted on 11/05/2010 8:16:23 AM PDT by oldbrowser (Welcome to the new workers paradise..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Dan Nunn

Palin is far better than Odonnel or Angle, she is tearing it up out there like nobody else, and has enormous influence. The primaries will decide, if you are correct that there are too many conservatives that cannot vote for her then she will lose in the primaries. If she wins and is the nominee, she will obliterate Obama.


12 posted on 11/05/2010 8:18:18 AM PDT by HerrBlucher (Defund, repeal, investigate, impeach, convict, jail, celebrate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

I understand what you are saying. My husband and I talk about this all the time. I’m not suffering from “Queen Bee” syndrome. I like and admire Sarah Palin. I personally would vote for her in a flash. My husband on the other hand not so sure. The one thing that we agree on... she needs a voice coach. When she talks in a normal conversational speech, it’s ok. When she’s on the stump, she sounds screechy. No one wants to listen to that everyday. Sure it is a superficial thing, but something that can sway people.


13 posted on 11/05/2010 8:18:49 AM PDT by republicangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Where was Obama 26 months before the presidentail election???

It seems to me that it was all about Hillary then.

Wait a while and let Sarah get some exposure. Right now many people only know the Sarah created by the LSM. The real people are going to get their eyes opened and will not be happy that they have been manipulated and lied to.


14 posted on 11/05/2010 8:18:49 AM PDT by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Palin is a weak candidate if she’s running against circa90’s Bill Clinton...
Palin is a strong candidate against obama...Hell I’m a good candidate against obama....


15 posted on 11/05/2010 8:21:11 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

I am interested in engaging in reasoned arguments with well informed (and literate) posters.

You, sir, are none of the above.


16 posted on 11/05/2010 8:22:27 AM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
After Tuesday’s showing of a weak candidate (O’Donnell) and a stronger candidate (Angle), can we please pick someone other than Palin in 2012? It wasn’t their principles that lost - as pure conservatives won elsewhere (Toomey), but the candidates themselves who lost.

Man, that is a weak position/argument you have there.

What is it about you PDS sufferers that you think you have to open your mouth and find any nit-picking thing to try and slam her?

The vast majority of the people she endorsed got elected and if it wasn't for her energy and fearlesness and tireless campaigning for good Tea-Party back candidates, we would be looking at a lot less of a victory margin today.

Get over your dislike for her and quit trying to spin what is positive to a negative because it is her.
17 posted on 11/05/2010 8:23:20 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sussex

The lamestream media is shallow but Sarah is “Oh so becoming!”.


18 posted on 11/05/2010 8:23:22 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
After Tuesday’s showing of a weak candidate (O’Donnell) and a stronger candidate (Angle), can we please pick someone other than Palin in 2012? It wasn’t their principles that lost - as pure conservatives won elsewhere (Toomey), but the candidates themselves who lost.

Palin had a list of 20 house members she was supporting who were running in districts that went for McCain but the Democrats won.

Of those 20, 18 won.

Sarah had also endorsed the following people who won as well:

1. Rubio - Florida Senator
2. Rand Paul - Kentucky Senator
3. Susanna Martinez - NM Governor


If you are going to base your argument on a set of facts, make sure you aren't cherry-picking your facts to support your conclusion.
19 posted on 11/05/2010 8:27:39 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
After Tuesday’s showing of a weak candidate (O’Donnell) and a stronger candidate (Angle), can we please pick someone other than Palin in 2012?

You sound like Karl Rove.

Palin has put forth a rather impressive performance, showing off a ratio of 29 wins to 17 losses (five races such as Alaska Senate and Minnesota Governor, as well as some smaller congressional races are still awaiting official results).

20 posted on 11/05/2010 8:28:45 AM PDT by McGruff (A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson