Posted on 11/22/2010 8:04:03 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus
Most media-watching conservatives have simply been flabbergasted at how the Old Media establishment has so neatly come together to destroy Sarah Palin. The Internet has been abuzz with examples of this attack on Sarah since she was chosen by John McCain to be her number two during the campaign for the 2008 presidential election. Every day there is a new example of it and here is yet another one.
This time it was penned by a "TV critic" for the Washington Post named Lisa de Moraes. De Moraes is well known for constantly injecting left-wing asides into her work and her Nov. 19 attack on the Palins is no exception.
She misled her readers (all 20 of them, I'm sure) right off the bat with her snotty headline, "Sarah Palin tries to lure Bristol's huge 'DWTS' audience to her far less popular TLC reality series."
What is with this "her far less popular" epithet? This claim is not based in logic.
De Moraes went on with her accusatory rhetoric...
More examples of the old media using both Palins to increase their own popularity.
Why not just post the whole content here at FR? Hmmm?
Or, maybe you'd prefer another "shot", like this one:
You seem to have omitted about half the blog posting.
Why not just post it here?
Funny, how the media is so utterly powerless against Palin.
Every shot they take against her just bounces back to them.
Coincidentally, you and the blogger are both from Illinois.
The question is WHY IS SARAH PALIN SO UNBELIEVABLY THREATENTING TO THE LEFT???
The answer is that she threatens a reliable RAT voting block: women. That scares the living daylights out of the RATS!!! RATS cannot get elected nationwide with out a solid majority of women voting for them. However, more and more women are realizing that bigger, more intrusive government is disastrous. We should keep this in mind everytime they attack her. And it should be reported as the cause: OVER AND OVER. That’s how you defeat the bias. EXPOSE IT and kill it.
I think the bottom line is, Conservatives are usually independent thinkers, and will certainly not buy into anything the MSM has to say...about anything.Yes, that is true. But the problem is that the media lies affect the opinions of the moderates and unaffiliated voters. THESE are the people that need to have the lies of the media pointed out to them.
sorry I dont visit blog pimps
... then you are a fool, deluded by a Soros-funded anti-conservative campaign. How does it feel to be a dupe of the left?
Soros funded? You are delusional. You have several choices. Either make your material suitable and acceptable to our readers here, ignore your critics, or post elsewhere. Continue attacking our posters with your absurd delusional fantasies and you will be laughed off the site.
Have you ever heard the phrase “Hoisted on his own petard?”
Big conspiracy, ain't it?
He sure is...did you see his thread from a few days ago? Just wow....
Either make your material suitable and acceptable to our readers here, ignore your critics, or post elsewhere.Now see. All you had to do was tell me this a month ago. I will ignore the critics and continue posting just as you suggest. Thanks for finally telling me your position.
That's right! You SCHOOL that Soros troll!
Give him hell! Tell him! Don't take any crap from him!
LOL!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAA!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.