Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Have You No Shame, Charlie Rangel?
Friends of Ours ^ | 12/05/10 | Friends of Ours

Posted on 12/05/2010 8:29:45 AM PST by AtlasStalled

Last week the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted by a margin of 333 over 79 to censure former Ways and Means Committee Chair Charlie Rangel for a series of ethical violations. * * *

And yet the fallen Representative has no shame. In a Nixonian riff he insists "I am not corrupt," and with an Alice-in-Wonderland logic insists he was not motivated by personal gain. * * *

Instead of accepting responsibility for his ethical violations Rangel blames political persecution. Of course, if anyone understands the mix of politics and crime it's Charlie Rangel. In 2006 Rangel attempted to derail a criminal prosecution against plaintiffs class action law firm Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP and several of its partners. * * * Notwithstanding the efforts by Rangel and others, the indicted partners subsequently all pleaded guilty, and the law firm agreed to pay a $75 million fine and employ a compliance monitor. Indeed, if there's any messy politics behind the current Rangel debacle, it's probably being used to spare the apparent tax cheat from a criminal investigation.

* * *

Meanwhile, yesterday Rangel returned home to his Harlem constituents with a hero's welcome and a standing ovation. * * * As P.T. Barnum once said: "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time." Rangel's constituents must be those people whom can be fooled all of the time since they ushered him into a 21st term last month with 81 percent of the vote. Or maybe his constituents simply are standing up for corruption.

(Excerpt) Read more at bitterqueen.typepad.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: rangel

1 posted on 12/05/2010 8:29:47 AM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

He has no shame, but he does have a home in the Bahamas, and two subsidized apartments in NY.


2 posted on 12/05/2010 8:36:48 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

“Rangel’s constituents must be those people whom can be fooled all of the time since they ushered him into a 21st term last month with 81 percent of the vote. Or maybe his constituents simply are standing up for corruption.”

Those constituents are not fooled at all. They obviously relish having a representative who thumbs his nose at the world. First, they had Adam Clayton Powell for 26 years and now 40 more by Rangel. 66 years is a long time of corruption, but not for the corrupt minded. If they didn’t approve they would not have allowed it.


3 posted on 12/05/2010 8:41:35 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

It’s tough being the sacrificial lamb, ain’t it Charlie?


4 posted on 12/05/2010 8:42:56 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
Have You No Shame, Charlie Rangel?
5 posted on 12/05/2010 8:44:47 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Um, to the writer at “Friends of Ours,” that quote was from Abe Lincoln, not P.T. Barnum who said something along the line of A Sucker’s born every minute.”


6 posted on 12/05/2010 8:45:23 AM PST by kitkat ( Obama's Hype and Chains just isn't working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Have You No Shame, Charlie Rangel?

7 posted on 12/05/2010 8:48:28 AM PST by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

If Rangel was Republican would he be let off so easily?


8 posted on 12/05/2010 9:11:19 AM PST by Paperdoll ( On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
66 years is a long time of corruption, but not for the corrupt minded. If they didn’t approve they would not have allowed it.

At what point does Corruption stop being the exception, and becomes the accepted norm? I believe we have passed that point, as the moral fiber of the Christian core beliefs that this nation was founded on fades and the end-times approach.

We are well on the way to becoming a mafia nation, similar to what Wikileaks has pointed out that Russia has become under Putin...

9 posted on 12/05/2010 9:14:46 AM PST by Dubh_Ghlase (Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls, It tolls for thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

RANGEL Card


10 posted on 12/05/2010 9:21:52 AM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

Sorry, Cholly, your race card has been declined.


11 posted on 12/05/2010 9:33:02 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
Harlem morals.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

12 posted on 12/05/2010 9:40:18 AM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Have you no shame, Charlie Rangel?

duh!!!! No!!!!!


13 posted on 12/05/2010 9:41:51 AM PST by Shimmer1 (Perseverance. In a confrontation between the river and the rock, the river always wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
So Republican Congressman “Duke” Cunningham goes to jail and Charlie Rangle gets a slap on the wrist. Hmmmmm.
14 posted on 12/05/2010 10:16:16 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

No, communists operate on a different set of moral and eithical codes than other Americans.


15 posted on 12/05/2010 10:23:26 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC_Pete

How a decorated war hero becomes a slithering, corrupt enttilement whore.


16 posted on 12/05/2010 11:52:19 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Having known both Duke Cunningham and Charlie Rangel, I have to say Rangel was a piker compared to Cunningham.

“Prosecutors call it a corruption case with no parallel in the long history of the U.S. Congress. And it keeps getting worse. Convicted Rep. Randall “Duke” Cunningham actually priced the illegal services he provided.
Randy “Duke” Cunningham
Randy “Duke” Cunningham poses with a Rolls Royce he received in exchange for granting government contracts.

Prices came in the form of a “bribe menu” that detailed how much it would cost contractors to essentially order multimillion-dollar government contracts, according to documents submitted by federal prosecutors for Cunningham’s sentencing hearing this Friday.

“The length, breadth and depth of Cunningham’s crimes,” the sentencing memorandum states, “are unprecedented for a sitting member of Congress.”

Prosecutors will ask federal Judge Larry Burns to impose the statutory maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.

The sentencing memorandum includes the California Republican’s “bribery menu” on one of his congressional note cards, “starkly framed” under the seal of the United States Congress.

The card shows an escalating scale for bribes, starting at $140,000 and a luxury yacht for a $16 million Defense Department contract. Each additional $1 million in contract value required a $50,000 bribe.

The rate dropped to $25,000 per additional million once the contract went above $20 million.

At one point Cunningham was living on a yacht named after him, “The Dukester,” docked near Capitol Hill, courtesy of a defense company president.


17 posted on 12/05/2010 12:09:55 PM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

Exactly. In Charlie’s mind, if you vote for Obamacare, food stamps, welfare and never-ending unemployment benefits, graft and corruption is then acceptable.


18 posted on 12/05/2010 12:38:57 PM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson