The OP is trying to pit us against each other with a Reagan vs Palin thread. It's a common troll tactic.
Plus, if you read all the responses, you'll see I'm not the only one that caught this and I'm not even the harshest critic.
And if the acronym means what I think it means I don’t see what it applies to in this thread... at all. No one said anything like that.
Well now I'm confused, did you read any of this thread? I'm not the one that used the acronym, the OP is....twice. I didn't even know what it meant until someone else told me. I will agree that the acronym had no place on this thread and didn't fit...which is why I asked about it!
I apologize regarding the acronym. I didn’t read every word on this rather wordy thread. I should have done a search before accusing you of being the first to post it.
And yes this thread is a bit juvenile, but so what? You see a troll, I see someone with a lot of enthusiasm. And I don’t see the harm.
What is the total number of threads posted in FR each year? It’s got to be in the tens of thousands, no?
I just don’t see the point of getting yourself worked up regarding one persons enthusiastic vanity thread. I mean, really, you can just make it a policy not to read any vanity posts at all, and you won’t be missing much by doing so.
Anyway, sorry again about falsely accusing you of inserting that acronym into the discussion.
By the way, speaking of acronyms... what is an “OP”?