Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: 'People Are Talking about American Decline – Don't Believe a Word of It'
Daily Caller ^ | 12/24/10 | eff Poor

Posted on 12/24/2010 2:58:30 PM PST by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: bluejay

“Instead, we could do a simple mental exercise - name 10 top software companies, then cross out all American corporations. You would be hard pressed to have more than 3 names left on the list.”

It’s irrelevant where a company is domiciled. What’s relevant is where they are doing their new hiring, and for what positions. And I’d love to blame Obama, but he is really not the cause of the problem; he just has done nothing whatsoever to help.

My company recently had a 6-figure job opening for Canadian data processing work, and Canadian law required that the person hired be physically located in Canada. In contrast US law allows US data processing work to be done over the internet from anywhere in the world. So 99% of those new job openings are now going to very capable people in low-wage English-speaking countries. Employers do this for the same reason you and I shop at Wal-Mart: to get a bargain. And I don’t blame the employers. The fault lies with a US Congress that has systematically betrayed the people it is elected to serve.


61 posted on 12/25/2010 9:32:08 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: devere

Debt, wealth redistribution, corruption, and waste. We are also #1 in making fools of ourselves on the world stage. How’s that for real change?


62 posted on 12/25/2010 9:42:13 PM PST by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: danielmryan

Heinlein, over the time I’ve known of him, doesn’t seem to blame “democracy”, but parasites. His words are usually edited for brevity; in the full, two paragraphs his disdain for for the post-literate, the intentionally-unenlightened, shows thru more clearly, I think:

“The America of my time line is a laboratory example of what can happen to democracies, what has eventually happened to all perfect democracies throughout all histories. A perfect democracy, a ‘warm body’ democracy in which every adult may vote and all votes count equally, has no internal feedback for self-correction. It depends solely on the wisdom and self-restraint of citizens… which is opposed by the folly and lack of self-restraint of other citizens. What is supposed to happen in a democracy is that each sovereign citizen will always vote in the public interest for the safety and welfare of all. But what does happen is that he votes his own self-interest as he sees it… which for the majority translates as ‘Bread and Circuses.’

‘Bread and Circuses’ is the cancer of democracy, the fatal disease for which there is no cure. Democracy often works beautifully at first. But once a state extends the franchise to every warm body, be he producer or parasite, that day marks the beginning of the end of the state. For when the plebs discover that they can vote themselves bread and circuses without limit and that the productive members of the body politic cannot stop them, they will do so, until the state bleeds to death, or in its weakened condition the state succumbs to an invader—the barbarians enter Rome.”
— Robert A. Heinlein


63 posted on 12/26/2010 5:29:47 AM PST by flowerplough (Thomas Sowell: Those who look only at Obama's deeds tend to become Obama's critics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
I am not trying to win an argument with you. I am merely running a public relations campaign. I am merely showing everyone that you are a naif, and I will let them decide for themselves whether to give your arguments any additional thought. BTW the financial services leeches are one of our weaknesses, not one of our national strengths. If you look at all the ways that Wall Street got itself into trouble through malinvestment of liquidity that was publicly provided, requiring continuing massive public bailouts, little if any is because they overinvested in productive enterprises (physical, human and intellectual capital to increase our ability to provide goods and services). Most of it is shopping malls, high rise condos in LA, provided no principal, no down payment mortgages on speculatives property deals, etc.

You, just like the financial "experts" who got us in this mess, would not recognize a genuinely productive activity if you were smacked across the face with it like a cold dead fish.

And just for the record, I am descending from sarcasm to personal insult. It is your intelligence I am insulting, in the hope that you will wake up, realize that God gave you eyes to see and a brain to think about what you see and and eyes again to see whether what your brain thinks corresponds with what is really going on.

64 posted on 12/26/2010 10:05:48 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: devere

> It’s irrelevant where a company is domiciled. What’s relevant is where they are doing their new hiring, and for what positions.

Actually, company’s domicile provides an extremely important insight into the economy. It is in the United States that the new companies are created. Today, in spite of all the gloom and doom there are thousands of new companies formed in this Country. Many of them will become tomorrow’s leaders. It is this dynamism that will drive American economy. All that is required is the removal of the economic uncertainty introduced by Obama’s regulations and massive spending binge. If Republicans can limit the damage over the next two years and if we can manage to elect a conservative President we will see the recovery as strong as the one under Reagan.

Granted, these are two very big “if’s”. But I can hope.


65 posted on 12/26/2010 7:13:10 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

> It is your intelligence I am insulting, in the hope that you will wake up, realize that ...

Not a great way to bring people over to your side either ;-) .

> If you look at all the ways that Wall Street got itself into trouble through malinvestment of liquidity that was publicly provided, requiring continuing massive public bailouts,

I realize that I am wasting my writing effort. However, its a holiday ...

Financial mis-investment did not cause the 2007/2008 problem. It was caused by mis-direction of investment due to government interventions. No private enterprise would willingly invest into losing causes. It is government subsidies funneled through the Fannie/Freddie monstrosities that created the ground work for the disaster. This was made worst by the bailout. Keep in mind that even in 2007/2008 there were many well managed and profitable financial companies. Under normal circumstances, we would have had a massive cleanup taking place on Wall Street. Bad firms would go under and their resources would be absorbed by those organizations that were well run. Unfortunately, the bailouts made sure that this cleanup would never occur. The really horrible mistake of the Bush bailout is it effectively transferred financial resources from well run companies to the the mis-managed once.


66 posted on 12/26/2010 7:27:22 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
No private enterprise would willingly invest into losing causes.

LOL! Like I said, your naivte is touching.

It was Alan Greenspan himself who admitted his great surprise (and grave error) upon discovering that individual officers at investment banks would operate to maximize their personal gain at the expense of the welfare of the shareholders. Lots of losing causes made lots of money for individuals while tanking the whole operation.

67 posted on 12/27/2010 9:56:08 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

You have a very strange view on business. Clearly not from personal experience.

BTW, does your handle refer to President Jackson?


68 posted on 12/27/2010 4:14:58 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson