Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I do not want civil discourse
Don Surber Blog ^ | 1-16-11 | Don Surber

Posted on 01/16/2011 9:33:20 AM PST by radioone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: radioone
"I want the lefties to feel bad. I want them to feel hurt. I want them to cry to their mommies."

Civil discourse is coming, like it or not. The Leftists aren't just going to run home and cry to mommy (or their two mommies, two daddies, mommy and a goat, daddy and a horse, whatever). As they lose their grip on the power they believe is theirs by right, they're coming unglued. It's not the "militia movement" that's going to foment civil discourse, it's Leftist groups backed by international communist organizations like the WWP and International ANSWER.

The article is right: don't censor your own speech in the name of "civility". Don't shy away from speaking your mind and speaking the truth. But realize that civil disorder is on its way, and it could get bloody. Our enemies aren't just going to run home and cry in their pillows...terrorist bombings, assassinations, kidnappings, outright street battles with the police and military, don't put anything past them. Our nation will resemble Athens, Paris and London if we're lucky. Mexico and Colombia if we're not.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

21 posted on 01/16/2011 10:26:13 AM PST by wku man (Still holding my breath, but exhaling a bit after Nov. 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
They have been waiting for ENABLED this event for years to claim we are violent and this is what they were after.
22 posted on 01/16/2011 10:26:53 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: radioone

I agree with every point made.

But I wonder, what will we do if they don’t stop what they are doing?

You say, “I will not allow people to label my words Hate Speech or try to lecture me on civility.”

I will not let an attack on my words go unanswered.

I will not begin any fight but I will do all in my power even to my death to win any fight brought my way. There are days I pray that the left and their mindless minions bring a fight.

I do not like the mockery that has been made of our United States and the Constitution, I resent it, I hate it and I want it to end.


23 posted on 01/16/2011 10:28:59 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

The domestic enemy within, (american marxists and the degenerate Congressional Progressive caucus and their comrades in the press), are the existential threat to the USA, not the ragheads.
Their unrelenting attacks on the natural order must be repelled and the lefts ability to make mischief neutralized.

That means congressional hearings, prosecutions, investigations, imprisonment, and not allowing them to hide, rest, or regroup.


24 posted on 01/16/2011 10:29:07 AM PST by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
"Pray for America"

By all means, pray...but don't stop there. Prepare.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

25 posted on 01/16/2011 10:31:58 AM PST by wku man (Still holding my breath, but exhaling a bit after Nov. 2...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: radioone
When people protested lefties made vulgar remarks about tea-bagging and giggled. So screw you and your civil discourse. I don’t want to hear it.

AMEN!!!

26 posted on 01/16/2011 10:34:05 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Please enlighten: “BLOAT”?


27 posted on 01/16/2011 10:37:32 AM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: radioone
Well said.


28 posted on 01/16/2011 10:38:01 AM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Yep, it’s so obvious. Like a dirty fighter who gets knocked to his knees and suddenly wants to call a truce. I’m not buying it either.


29 posted on 01/16/2011 10:41:22 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; radioone
Dan Rather forged a document to try to derail Bush’s re-election.

That is an inaccurate statement. Dan Rather did not forge the documents. IMHO they would have been even clumsier forgeries if he had.

At worse, Dan totally neglected to have the anonymously sent documents vetted. That makes it gross incompetence on his part, not malice. Not to say he isn't malicious, just that his total lack of honesty and integrity were more important in this case.

30 posted on 01/16/2011 10:50:19 AM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; radioone
No mention of those forgeries is complete without this old favorite:

Photobucket

31 posted on 01/16/2011 10:55:51 AM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: radioone

“Civil discourse” is just another word for bi-partisanship. This is unelected influence liberals demand when they are in the minority. Been going on forever.


32 posted on 01/16/2011 10:59:11 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone
"Civil discourse" does not mean "no dissent."

-PJ

33 posted on 01/16/2011 11:08:28 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ("Comprehensive" reform bills only end up as incomprehensible messes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

I agree with the “Bite me” statement, although I wouldn’t want them to actually do it. They might give me their brain disease.

They are trying to deflect the truth, truth about many things like how they think we are empty-mided sheep, how they have no honor and no real love of anything but power and are willing sacrafice anything to get it (even throw the baby out with the bathwater). They like to talk about greedy capitalists, but in reality there is no matching the damage to society by greedy politicians. It would be nice if they would pull the log out of thier own eyes before commenting on the splinters in others.


34 posted on 01/16/2011 11:22:21 AM PST by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Hope yer well Buddy....Stay safe !


35 posted on 01/16/2011 11:29:52 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I agree with what you say, but, the rock worshippers are a clear and present danger enabled by the PC climate of the leftists. They are in lockstep with the progressives who wish to destroy our way of worship, life and liberty.


36 posted on 01/16/2011 11:40:41 AM PST by Sparky21555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
o far, I have seen insufficient evidence that the GOP wishes to really stop Obama's push into Leftist tyranny. The GOP, IMO, still doesn't get it, and still sees the Tea Party as the biggest threat to the country.

Alas, this is becoming evident. For example, Democrats criticized the Republicans for using the expression "job-killing" to describe Obamacare, saying that it's too violent. Most of us on FR would say this charge is fatuous, yet just this morning, I heard on Fox News that Rep. John Boehner is now using the term "job-destroying" to describe Obamacare.

37 posted on 01/16/2011 12:01:44 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

Is it my imagination or is your post moving?


38 posted on 01/16/2011 12:05:47 PM PST by brytlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
It is changing between two documents. One is the document Dan Rather had to "prove" that Bush 43 was given special protection while in the TANG, the other was made with computer software not available in 1973. You will note that they are virtually identical, the differences are believed to be caused by copying and then copying the copy a number of times to make it look old.
39 posted on 01/16/2011 1:09:44 PM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

More about it here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents


40 posted on 01/16/2011 1:17:40 PM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson