Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan - Exploded Nuclear Plant Uses MOX Fuel - Not Uranium!
http://sherriequestioningall.blogspot.com ^ | 3-14-11 | Sherrie

Posted on 03/14/2011 5:46:30 AM PDT by Whenifhow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: Whenifhow

Anyone else experience their browser locking up from the linked web page failing to load completely?


41 posted on 03/14/2011 6:13:22 AM PDT by listenhillary (Social Justice is the epitome of injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Someone in the news said that the plant is something like 50 years old...and ready to be de commissioned. Maybe, they weren’t as sensitized to tsunami events when it was built.


42 posted on 03/14/2011 6:14:03 AM PDT by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; martin_fierro; wolfpat
A recap for those of you playing along at home:

I hereby declare this a BLOG FAIL.
43 posted on 03/14/2011 6:16:31 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Thanx


44 posted on 03/14/2011 6:16:32 AM PDT by John 3_19-21 (For government to give anyone a benefit they must first take it from someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

No, no, no.

It is FAR worse than that.

The danger level has been pegged to the US National Debt!


45 posted on 03/14/2011 6:17:18 AM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

What a horrible piece of misinformation designed to create panic.


46 posted on 03/14/2011 6:17:26 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Right. I also wonder if there is a way to operate the plant remotely. I mean if, as in the case of the tsunami, people can’t reach the facility, could there be a remote access for basic failsafe functions like, shut down, etc.?


47 posted on 03/14/2011 6:17:32 AM PDT by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Take a look at this wackos site and you see that she is reacting to the media.-CNN says that and FOXNEWS says this and on and on. The media are a bunch of mass hysteria WHORES. They need that mass hysteria to keep their rating uup and will do anything to keep the ball rolling.

Drudge is about the worst of them all...He has taken a simple play out of the swindle sheet playbook-sensationalism. That is where these media whores are getting a lot of their leads from. Instead of investigating the story they are using those like Drudge to cover their leads.


48 posted on 03/14/2011 6:17:55 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

I’m starting to think putting Thorazine in the water supply may not be a bad idea after all.


49 posted on 03/14/2011 6:18:50 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff

Wow, get your panties out of a twist. Idiot? You are a basket case moron.

Especially when you resort to name calling and then pronounce yourself not idiotic.

Chill out.

Are you capable of making a reasoned post instead of a nasty diatribe?


50 posted on 03/14/2011 6:19:42 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Someone in the news said that the plant is something like 50 years old...and ready to be de commissioned. Maybe, they weren’t as sensitized to tsunami events when it was built.

I think the problem was that the Tsunami they got was way bigger than what they expected. From what I read yesterday they had a sea wall designed to stop tsunami, and against the kind thrown up by a 7.0 it would have been sufficient. But this one just went right over the top.

The good news is that putting the diesel generators into a concrete dome with an airlock would be a fairly cheap retrofit on the other plants. If the building is water tight it doesn't matter if the sea wall gets topped. It doesn't help them in this case. However; they have a lot of other reactors and what is happening now is not something you would ever want to do again.
51 posted on 03/14/2011 6:22:46 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: davisfh


52 posted on 03/14/2011 6:23:07 AM PDT by Red Badger (How can anyone look at the situation in Libya and be for gun control is beyond stupid. It's suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
Right. I also wonder if there is a way to operate the plant remotely

No - too complicated and too vulnerable it sabotage.

shut down, etc

I'm sure the plant was shut down immediately. The problem is the decay products after heat. You have to keep the cooling pumps running to carry off the decay heat for days after the core shuts down. The emergency diesels are supposed to provide the power to do this, but apparently they were not adequately protected from the quake or the following tsunami. It was a design shortfall in the plant emergency systems that caused the problems.

53 posted on 03/14/2011 6:25:22 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Jeeze, you have enough tracking software on your site? I got 12 warnings when clicking on it. Reason number one billion why I shouldn’t click on blog links.


54 posted on 03/14/2011 6:25:53 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Sherrie baby...I don’ told you a thousand million times....DON’T EXAGERATE.


55 posted on 03/14/2011 6:27:39 AM PDT by spokeshave (WTF....the only thing 0bambi's investments will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
“I am SHOCKED at what I found! This power plant meltdown can be 2 MILLION times Worse than Chernobyl!”

No offense to the poster; but this type of garbage really degrades Free Republic.

I think of people who post here as serious, educated, and well informed people. People who seek facts and science.

This type of article illustrates the worst qualities of the Internet. That is, anyone with a pulse can string words together and call them “another viewpoint”.

56 posted on 03/14/2011 6:28:17 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Yes We Can, have smaller government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

57 posted on 03/14/2011 6:30:42 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

Take a look at this blog post, and the comment in #48, for a great example of what I was talking about in the other thread.


58 posted on 03/14/2011 6:33:10 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT ALERT

NUCLEAR OVER-REACTOR in full meltdown


59 posted on 03/14/2011 6:35:43 AM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Japanese Earthquake Implications Quick Q&A

Published in Sendai Earthquake by Kirk Sorensen on March 12th, 2011

I apologize for how long it has taken for me to get this blog post up, and I apologize in advance for answers that may prove to be inaccurate and overtaken by events. I am going to try to answer a number of questions I have received through email and Facebook and queries to this page since the Japanese earthquake struck.



Q: What’s going on with the reactor in Japan?

A: The Fukushima-Daiichi reactors were damaged by the quake and the tsunami that followed. There were six reactors operating at the site, all of them boiling-water reactors (BWRs) built by General Electric between 1970 and 1979. These early BWR designs were not built to the same standards that BWRs and other light-water reactors (LWRs) are built to today, and do not have a full containment system that can hold all of the steam in that would be released from damage in the reactor vessel.

At the time of the quake, only three of the units (1, 2, and 3) were operating. They were immediately shut down. Fission stopped. BWRs don’t use borated water and there was no need to add boron to the coolant. The first unit (FD1) appears to have the most difficulties. These older BWRs need emergency power to cool down safely, and their backup generators were damaged by the tsunami. That seems to be the root of the problem.

Q: What about the radiation released? Is it dangerous?

A: It would appear that some of the nuclear fuel in FD1 has melted and released gaseous fission products to the interior of the reactor. These would include xenon, krypton, and iodine. There are about seven isotopes of xenon that are radioactive and would be released in such an incident, with atomic masses of 133, 135, 137, and 138, along with three isomers, 131m, 133m, and 135m. With the exception of the isomers, each of these xenon atoms will decay into cesium and some into other elements past cesium. There is also krypton but its radioactivity and decay products are of less concern.

Xenon itself is not particularly dangerous. It is a noble gas and is not concentrated in the body. Cesium is more of a concern. Here are the seven decay sequences:

Xenon-131m will decay to stable xenon-131.
Xenon-133m will decay to radioactive xenon-133.
Xenon-133 will decay to stable cesium-133.
Xenon-135m will decay to radioactive xenon-135.
Xenon-135 will decay to very mildly radioactive cesium-135.
Xenon-137 will decay to radioactive cesium-137.
Xenon-138 will decay to radioactive cesium-138 and then quickly to stable barium-138.

Of all of these, the decay of xenon-137 to cesium-137 is probably responsible for the most risk, but xenon-137 decays so quickly that the mobility of cesium-137 is limited. I do not think this poses much risk because it can’t get far. The xenon-135 has a longer half-life (9 hours) but decays to a nearly harmless form of cesium (135). I think this poses almost no risk due to the very long half life of cesium-135.

I apologize for this long explanation but you are going to hear the news about cesium being detected and I wanted to tell you why and what it means.

Q: Is nuclear power unsafe?

A: No. It is far safer than chemical power and renewable power. Look at the burning refineries and gas lines. There are no burning reactors. People are scared of “radiation” and don’t understand what it means. The media makes little attempt to tell them. I am trying to be a resource to help explain because I have had some training in this area. A dam gave way due to the earthquake. That’s not safe either.




Q: What about the radiation? Will I be harmed?

A: No. These isotopes of xenon and krypton and iodine decay quickly. The most dangerous is iodine-131 and the public can be protected during the 30-40 days it will decay by taking potassium iodide pills. These are effective and should be used by people in the evacuation areas.

Q: Will there be fallout? Will it reach the US or China?

A: No, there will be no fallout. It will not reach the US or China.

Q: Why are they detecting all this radiation?

A: Radiation is easy to detect in exceptionally small quantities. You can also identify exactly what nuclide it came from. This is very useful to diagnose what is going on. For instance, if you detect iodine or cesium, you can deduce that these are fission products and there may have been core damage. But simply detecting these isotopes does not mean they are present in sufficient amounts to harm people.



60 posted on 03/14/2011 6:36:08 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson