Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has There Ever Been An American President Who Wanted To Be President Of China?
Flopping Aces ^ | 03-16-11 | Skookum

Posted on 03/16/2011 2:02:43 PM PDT by Starman417

Criticism is hard on a Narcissist; especially, if he is the president of a country that allows dissent. Our National Narcissist has a fragile ego, when he makes mistakes that are being analyzed by an informed public that is unafraid to speak out, he can't help but wonder what happened to the Myth of Obama, the magic responsible for his creation: unfortunately for Mr Obama, the public is increasingly skeptical of this man who was elected with hype over substance and they are wondering when they will see evidence of the superior intelligence that was so openly promoted during the campaign, but this innate intelligence is kept carefully hidden, like the scholastic records of the most intelligent man in the world.

The American people now recognize dithering as an evasion of responsibility and the inability to make decisive decisions. No longer are we willing to accept this trait toward indecision as a symptom of a superior mind weighing important decisions; rather than appearing poised and in control, he seems weak and clueless; unless, his Socialist ideology specifically covers the situation in question. Consequently, the word "dithering" has become entrenched in the American lexicon: previously, there was a reluctance to use this word in "enlightened"conversation, there was always the lingering doubt of the word's official status as a word. Now, there is no doubt concerning the word's meaning or its official status; for evermore, "dithering" is a word that will be a part of the American language for a hundred years or more, President Obama has assured its place in the lexicon and our history.

His fall from the pedestal of confidence that was carefully constructed by the Democrat directed news (propaganda) organizations is his own fault; however, with the immaturity of the typical Narcissist, he blames his misfortune on the dissent and criticism of the public, while ignoring the fact that he has created the ill-feelings and disillusionment among the citizenry of our country and the world. Our enemies, recognize his timidness and indecision, while planning tactics and strategy to exploit these weaknesses.

With a childish petulance he has stated that he would rather be the president of China; of course, China doesn't allow dissent and a Narcissist neurosis can flourish and be free from persecution complexes with complete totalitarian control over the population, without ever facing the wrath of a hostile and increasingly skeptical public.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: china; obama

1 posted on 03/16/2011 2:02:49 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I’m sure that China would not accept a Kenyan for that position.


2 posted on 03/16/2011 2:05:58 PM PDT by 353FMG (Liberalism = Communism under the guise of compassion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I remember an interview with OReilly during the China Olympics. Obama spoke admiringly that China was able to shut down the city for the Olympics, or some such thing.

OReilly did not challenge him, but I will be gracious and maybe say that didn’t occur to him, as it seemed almost a throwaway remark.

But being able to shut down a city, businesses, schools etc for a day or two is a tyrannical power we do not want. That Obama thought it a good idea alone should have sent warning signals to everyone.


3 posted on 03/16/2011 2:08:29 PM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The question should be, Has there ever been a China plot to own a president of the U.S.? Maybe Obama’s chip is just malfunctioning and wants to go home for repairs.


4 posted on 03/16/2011 2:13:59 PM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

To be fair, Obummer never said he wanted to be President of China, he said it would be easier, and is probably would be.


5 posted on 03/16/2011 2:16:22 PM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Obamasan


6 posted on 03/16/2011 2:17:35 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Not a one.


7 posted on 03/16/2011 2:46:07 PM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead
"To be fair, Obummer never said he wanted to be President of China, he said it would be easier, and is probably would be."

It would be easier on us; that's for sure.
8 posted on 03/16/2011 2:54:04 PM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Well it is a lot easier. You don’t have that pesky Constitution to deal with or 90 million gun owners.


9 posted on 03/16/2011 3:21:03 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

“To be fair, Obummer never said he wanted to be President of China, he said it would be easier, and is probably would be.”

What? He’s already got it made in the shade, with a lot more perks and status.


10 posted on 03/16/2011 6:22:18 PM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I want him to be President of China, too.


11 posted on 03/16/2011 6:23:49 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

A smart fellow on CNBC observed that:

China has central planning done by mathematicians, engineers, and scientists, and the US has central planning done by lawyers. Obviously they’re going to win.

Baraq (J.D. Harvard) doesn’t qualify, LOL.


12 posted on 03/16/2011 6:27:02 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson