First, I didn't get it from the Sentinel story. That blog didn't tell 10% of the story. In addition, the emphasis was all wrong, too. It was more of an apology than an expose.
I got mine info from a Sentinel photo editor, over some beers, who was pissed about lack of coverage, and in fact, the lack of outrage.
And secondly, since “you are sure this is not the first time (I) have “pulled” this,” and that is purely a baseless, libelous and false ad homonym attack, and that is banned by FR, please ban yourself from FR for at least 72 hours.
The reality is, you have a significant group of current and former REAL conservative current and former journalists doing some real reporting here, but all too often, they get prevented from doing so by some inexperienced non reporters who have been given a little authority, but little common sense.
BTW, If you are so cowardly as to ban me from FR for telling the truth, your loss, far from mine.
And as you also well know, anybody who starts with the lawyer-speak is banned...
And it's spelled, "ad hominem", Mr. Winchell...