Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9th Circuit to hear eligibility questions
WND ^ | March 30, 2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/30/2011 3:00:52 PM PDT by RobinMasters

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: Michael.SF.

That is what McCain could have/should have done. However, on thinking of McCain’s comment to the little old lady that Obama was a good man and would make a good POTUSA the reason he didn’t challenge at the time is partially explaned. It should be noted also that VP Chenney never used his option to ask if there were any reasons not to certify the election. Many politicians have egg on their face over this issue.


141 posted on 03/30/2011 10:01:31 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

That is what McCain could have/should have done. However, on thinking of McCain’s comment to the little old lady that Obama was a good man and would make a good POTUSA the reason he didn’t challenge at the time is partially explaned. It should be noted also that VP Chenney never used his option to ask if there were any reasons not to certify the election. Many politicians have egg on their face over this issue.


142 posted on 03/30/2011 10:01:50 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
Conservatism at its core is about facing up to the actual reality of a situation, ...

Like providing links to sources for statements you make. An old FReeper tradition and expectation.

143 posted on 03/30/2011 10:02:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: in the wind
So ya made me go look it up. It is a Certificate of Live Birth, it was issued to me in 2005, by the county clerks office, to satisfy a passport application. In 04 the clerk told me this was the only form available to me for for proof of birth.

There you go. You presented a Certificate of Live Birth, not a Certification of Live Birth.

What I told you before about the validity of a COLB comports with the testimony of hundreds of Freepers who've posted their experiences with birth documents on these bc threads.

Frankly, the Certification of Live Birth is hardly worth the paper it's printed on, as it isn't accepted as proof of identity by any government agency. Yet, Obama et al hold the amateurish forgery they claim as his Hawaiian COLB up as "proof" of his eligibility to hold the office of president.

It would be laughable, if it weren't so deadly serious. We are witness to the greatest fraud ever perpetrated upon the American people.

144 posted on 03/30/2011 10:02:55 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Reading comprehension skills mean not taking a sentence from a paragraph in isolation and assuming it means what you what it to mean. The entire paragraph does not support your interpretation, which is obvious to educated people. By which I mean people who at least understand the use of quotation marks in legal analysis. Or pretty much any analysis, for that matter.
145 posted on 03/30/2011 10:05:18 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

No it is actually you who have no legal background as to how to read legal precedent at all. Even remotely.

If this case is to be heard again for real there is not even a chance that the weak argument you are making will hold even the slightest weight over the decision.

The case you cite is not a case whereas the issue was a NBC Constitutional issue and will not hold any bearing at all on a decision. Motions will easily dismiss such a weak precedent being that there was no case before the Court at all to argue the Constitutional NBC issue. You cant have a decision whereas there was no defense.

You are a hack in so much as you try to use slight of hand in order to mock other posters on this issue. It is actually very insulting as to many of the posts you make whereas you claim others have no understanding but then imply that you do.

I absolutely agree with the post above sighting your track record here at FR that you are a troll here to post on one agenda and the post I read from you whereas you suggest that we all have grown and should disregard the original meanings of the Constitution is sickening.

You have no precedent backed by any legal scholar at all except left-wing hacks. No lawyer at all would accept a decision whereas there was no counter argument at all on the issue it was deciding.

Also Obama has no standing to be President of the United States.

Barack Obama is in my opinion not even really his really name. There is no evidence at all that it is, while there is heaps of evidence as to the fraud he has committed.

Every single True American needs to demand that Obama release ALL of his past records, just as Chuck Shumer and the democrat party demanded that of McCain and they demanded that of Bush as well.

The evidence against Obama is overwhelming to any rational minded person. He is not a Natural Born American Citizen by a long shot.

He has campaigned in Kenya for socialist mass murderer. He does not have two American citizen parents by his own admission but instead also has dual loyalties to Kenya as he demonstrated by violating the Logan Act in campaigning for Odinga.

His name is not even really Obama but Barry Soetoro by all logic. Any rational person would come to that conclusion based upon the very slim amount of documents that have been released and evidence that is known already now. He even has a phony social security number. The DNC even out of fear removed the term ‘Natural Born Citizen’ from his election registration forms.

You either have to be a complete total idiot to think that Obama is eligibile to be President or a complete left-wing hack. Actually ‘complete left-wing hack’ equals ‘complete total idiot’ So you are both.


146 posted on 03/30/2011 10:05:49 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Never a resident? Was he not residing in Hawaii at the time?


147 posted on 03/30/2011 10:06:24 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: noinfringers2
VP Cheney never used his option to ask if there were any reasons not to certify the election

100% agree with that regarding Cheney. His not doing anything serves as testimony that others are calling the shots and the nod was given to Obama.

148 posted on 03/30/2011 10:06:40 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Going to Charlotte for the barbecue is like going to Minneapolis for the gumbo - John Reed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
“So, when are you going to provide links to verify your two ground-breaking stories?”

You made that statement at least once in reference to my citing a recent legal decision that states two citizen parents are not required to be NBC. I gave you the reference. If you're too stupid to look it up, don't come whining to me.

149 posted on 03/30/2011 10:08:04 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

Bull shit! The “entire paragraph” perfectly supports my assertion and not yours. Are you a moron?


150 posted on 03/30/2011 10:09:45 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

That is not what is meant by resident and you know it. Barack 0bama Sr. was in the U.S. on a student visa.


151 posted on 03/30/2011 10:12:39 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf
I write legal briefs and review precedent. I get paid good money to do it by people and corporations who trust my judgment. And I think my track record on predicting these cases in detail speaks for itself.

Does yours?

152 posted on 03/30/2011 10:13:04 PM PDT by tired_old_conservative (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative
No, that has nothing to do with the two ground breaking stories you claim to have knowledge of. Again you lie.

You said 0bama's COLB had been examined by someone. Link please.

You also said a court had issued an opinion that 0bama was a Natural Born Citizen. Link please.

Stop lying and deflecting and provide your evidence of those two never-before-published stories.

153 posted on 03/30/2011 10:16:54 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

“...and until a court establishes a binding distinction between native born and natural born. That is extremely unlikely.”

Again nonsense..... The USSC decision Wong Kim Arc provided the distinction between Natural and native born citizenship using the 14th Amendment as a basis for it’s reasoning.

Prior to WKA all born citizens were those born to two citizen parents with those born “in country” having the higher quality of NBC. See jus sanquines (citizen by parenthood), and jus sanquines plus jus solis the highest quality of born citizenship.....Natural Born Citizenship.

In deciding WKA the USSC established jus solis alone as a basis for born citizenship, completely disregarding the citizenship of the parents. This ruling did not “establish” anchor babies because it requires the non citizen parents to have aliegance (sic)to the US in order for the child to attain citizenship by native birth.

While all “natural born citizens are “born” citizens not all born citizens are natural born citizens.


154 posted on 03/30/2011 10:19:03 PM PDT by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: All

(tapping fingers while the liar consults with his handlers)


155 posted on 03/30/2011 10:23:27 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye


156 posted on 03/30/2011 10:36:32 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

“Well, I tried to be polite since you asked. Obviously, that’s a waste of time on people like you.”

I asked the original question to see if you were going to drag out the highly flawed Ankeny decision. Like the fool you are, you took the bait and yep “look what the cat just dragged in!” You didn’t really expect that kinda poop to fly here on FR did ya?

The waste of time is you. Trolls are only fun up to a point. It’s long since past the point where you can be taken seriously. It’s now time for all to point their fingers in your direction and have a good hearty belly laugh. Like Rodney Dangerfield you’ll get no respect here.....you’ll just get what you’ve earned. Nada....

Sorry Troll, I’m no longer gonna wrestle in the mud with ya! Tell your buddy Obama FU for me!

Ta ta Sonny!


157 posted on 03/30/2011 10:39:20 PM PDT by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

LOL BOR is a dunce but he’s smarter than the 0bot troll here.


158 posted on 03/30/2011 10:39:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Considering that Obama fights to conceal every single aspect of his life that he can who the heck knows.

Barry Soetoro is an enigma that is propped up by a very corrupt leftist tyranny.

Chuck Shumer stood and demanded transparency from McCain and the democrats have shrilled for years upon end about investigating Republicans.

Any left-wing hack that thinks that fraud of this Presidency shouldn’t be held to the same standards that every past President has been held too is a low-life.

Bush was hounded for records. McCain had to go to Congress even to have a resolution passed. But the disusting liars that we see defend Obama from transparency are nothing but hacks.


159 posted on 03/30/2011 10:47:39 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: tired_old_conservative

I would love to come down to your workplace and compete with you. I would write legal briefs all over you. You are nothing but a hack.

You know nothing about the law.


160 posted on 03/30/2011 10:51:17 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson