[Baynative]

If proven ineligible it would be impossible to remove him. It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots. No one in Congress has the nerve to pursue enforcing the Constitution.

BUT - it would call to question the validity of any laws he has signed, or any executive orders he has created and probably eliminate a run at reelection, I would think.

[Starboard]

Just one state needs to require evidence of birth place to get on the ballot for 2012. That would be very interesting.

[Never on my watch]

...and certainly lead to race riots...

Those are coming regardless. When the occupants of inner city wastelands like Detroit MI and Camden NJ start to realize they aren't gonna get their free kitchens and concierge doctors, they are going to explode.

[ladyjane]

It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots.

Excellent reason to ignore the Constitution. Not.

[Las Vegas Ron]

It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots.

So we should be held hostage by those who would threaten us with riots?

I guess we'll never cut any entitlements, get rid of illegals or should even consider reducing spending because those things too are going to cause riots.

Better to let the Country collapse than have riots /s

[Blogatron]

It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots.

Long overdue.

[maine-iac7]

It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots.

We could survive that far better than 'bummerCare, the Socialist take over of private co operations and the reestablishment of the Caliphate - doncha think?

[Red in Blue PA]

So because there probably would be race riots by criminal elements, we should all just ignore the Constitution?

Great logic there!/s

[Red in Blue PA]

Let me nominate yours as Dumbest Post of the Year.

[VeeP22]

“It would tear the nation apart and certainly lead to race riots”.

***********

Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn. Let them riot.