Posted on 04/19/2011 10:31:09 AM PDT by jazusamo
This will “require” NOTHING. He can write whatever he wants. Ht can invoke whatever he wishes. If his order violates the CLEAR language of the Constitution, then his ORDER DOES NOT HAVE the force of law.
Now, he might send his thugs to come kill me, or throw me in a gulag, but that doesn’t make his “law” either “right” or “legal,” much less Constitutional.
So, go ahead, make a “fiat declaration” in this regard. The American People may bow, they make obey. I. for one, will not let those chains weight heavily upon me.
No, the panel didn’t discuss it. Baeir reported on it.
I do remember that many of the items would be a simple act of Congress. Others would take Amendments to the Constitution. I'll ping you when I find it.
Do we need any more proof that he needs to be impeached, along with Schumer?
>Methinks it is about time for the SCOTUS to smack this tin pot down a few pegs.
The problem with that is that you’re assuming the Supreme Court cares about things like Justice; I submit to you that the 2005 Kelo v. New London — which establishes a precedent for utterly destroying legal property rights — proves otherwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.