Posted on 04/19/2011 10:31:09 AM PDT by jazusamo
Just because the Robert’s court has refused to address this issue, doesn’t mean that the court is his protector; it might mean that they don’t want to have to worry what gets ignited when they start their cars...
Why the sudden need for over 350,000 detainee handbooks ___ ?
Do they need a new excuse to activate all those FEMA prison camps ___ ?
What’s the intent behind the leaks? Could they be on purpose?
The wannabe is sure beginning to look like the real thing. Making a pretty good impression of a South American thug.
Executive Orders can be challenged in court, usually on the grounds that the Order deviates from “congressional intent” or exceeds the President’s constitutional powers. In one such notable instance, President Harry Truman, was rebuked by the Supreme Court for overstepping the bounds of presidential authority. After World War II, Truman seized control of steel mills across the nation in an effort to settle labor disputes. In response to a challenge of this action, the Supreme Court ruled that the seizure was unconstitutional and exceeded presidential powers because neither the Constitution or any statute authorized the President to seize private businesses to settle labor disputes. For the most part, however, the Court has been fairly tolerant of wide range of executive actions.
Nothing happens by accident with these enemies of America.
They have hundreds or more taxpayer paid minions setting around
planning every little move every minute of the day and night. We are being overwhelmed with evil, sneaky, vermin.
But I must hand it to the America hating vermin.
They do know how to work it.
We have scared, lazy, dumbazzes walking around with their thumbs up their noses.
I doubt that this would happen to 0.
Come on Congress, impeach the little bastard.
Riiiight, for the want of nebulous threats (like the foolishness you just tried to float at FR), one of the main branches of OUR government steps aside so a lying fraud can occupy one of the other two branches. Yeah, I see what you mean ... *sheesh* some fools don’t deserve what the founders established!
I’ll second that!!
We’re approaching a point where the exposure will force the mild-mannered to, quote Obama, “get in their faces”.
The Country is proving itself not to be the pushover the Leftist turds anticipated.
which dictator shall we call him? or shall we run all their names together...
HitTroVezZEROlini
What army is going to enforce this? Ignore it.
Get ready, be ready, prepare. I think you are right.
Barack Mugabe Obama.
Listen, you did not directly answer my question, instead you floated a speculative theory that the Roberts’ court was in the 0’s back pocket. I have demonstrated that that two can play that game. So next time, why don’t you give some concrete proof instead of your speculation?
You assumed you were worthy of a cogent reply ... mistake, n00b.
I have seen in the past where this could be humorous or entertaining...but today it scares the hell out of me....this guy (Obama) is nothing but a puppet/spy/communist in the Oval office...I honestly have no where to turn...all that’s left are politicians...the statesmen have left the room
I asked you to support your allegation. You said the court refused to look at NBC, therefore they must be O's protectors. But without supporting evidence, your thought is just speculation. I made a equally preposterous and unsupported claim. You harangue me for my response, when yours is of equal speculation.
By denigrating me, you are no better than Obama. Attack the questioner instead of the question.
And I will repeat my original post:
You: HAH! The subPreme Roberts Court is Barry the Bastard’s primary protector. Didn’t you know?
Me: Can you support that accusation?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.