Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Selling Sexy, Taliban-style: Wear a Hijab or Die
David Horowitz's NewsReal Blog ^ | Megan Fox

Posted on 04/20/2011 11:47:47 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien

Violent threats are the soup du jour for most Islamofacists. It seems to be the only way they know how to communicate their terrible ideas, such as that women should be wrapped up in sheets and if they refuse they should be buried in the ground and stoned. An Asian woman working in a pharmacy in England was threatened with death if she continued speaking out about the harassment she receives for not wearing a burka.

An Asian woman who works in a pharmacy in east London was told to dress more modestly and wear a veil or the shop would be boycotted.

When she went to the media to talk about the abuse she suffered, a man later entered the pharmacy and told her: ‘If you keep doing these things, we are going to kill you’.

It’s a public relations nightmare. For a religion which wants to dominate the world and convert the masses, they might want to consider that death threats might not be the best strategy. At my church, we bribe people with free coffee and pastries. Since Muslims have been living in the West for a considerable time now you would think they would have picked up on how easy it is to sell an idea, especially to Western women who are notoriously swayed by every new fad no matter how nuts. Western women will wear turkey feathers on their heads if that’s what Heidi Klum says is a must have for this season.

Clearly, Islamofascists need to start selling the burqa as sexy.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/20/2011 11:47:49 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
Even with stories surfacing about the persecution of formally free women in Western societies, the Left refuses to believe their favorite religion, Islam, is a dangerous beast.

Surely she meant formerly instead of formally free women in Western societies.

2 posted on 04/20/2011 12:02:42 PM PDT by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

As far as I’m concerned, men who seriously threaten women with death or who kill women simply for failing to display grossly public signs of subjugation to men, are no more than vermin that need to be removed from the gene pool post-haste. There is no reforming them and there is no place for them on God’s earth. The women brainwashed to accept such subjugation should be immediately rounded up and sent to live with some Texas Women to spend a year or two wrangling cattle and fighting rattlesnakes and feral hogs so they can grow some balls of their own. Addressing violence towards women with appeasement and groveling doesn’t work. Why aren’t the women in Britain out in the streets protesting? imo jmo moo


3 posted on 04/20/2011 12:10:23 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

I wonder if Ann Barnhardt is right. 1400 hundred years of sanctioned inbreeding (marriages of first cousins within the filthy islamic pool-islam is the only culture on earth that approves of inbreeding) has led to a populace that had mental issues out the yahoo.


4 posted on 04/20/2011 12:17:56 PM PDT by Republic (The entire White House presidential team needs to grow up and face facts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien
I don't know about the rest of the world, but in Texas when somebody tries to outlaw Daisy Dukes and halter tops, guns will come out.

I will admit that I have seen a few examples of this attire that almost made me wish for hijabs, but judged as a whole - the good and the bad, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PRY THEM OUT OF MY COLD DEAD FINGERS!

The world has little enough worth looking at anyway - besides, according to the recent news story I'm just looking so as to make my marriage stronger.

5 posted on 04/20/2011 12:20:40 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

From the article: “Naomi Wolf thinks shrouded women living under suffocating rags is dead sexy.”

Attributed to the FemiNazi: “When sexuality is kept private and directed in ways seen as sacred – and when one’s husband isn’t seeing his wife (or other women) half-naked all day long – one can feel great power and intensity when the headscarf or the chador comes off in the the home.”

This, fellow FReepers, is an unambiguously transparent case of the American FemiNazi J.A.P as Dhimmitrix.

Intellectual ‘presstitution’ in all its fawning cowardice. This Dhimmitrix’s lines leave the reader wondering how much Moslim money was needed to induce the writing of such convoluted intellectual contortions.


6 posted on 04/20/2011 12:26:22 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



Free Republic is your path to freedom


Give once
Or donate monthly and a sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10

Urgent: Save Lazamataz! Donate

7 posted on 04/20/2011 12:46:04 PM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael van der Galien

“An Islamic Valentine for Lara Logan”

Pssst…that catchy title was just to grab your attention. This letter is meant for you infidel men.

You infidel women, please click back to fuzzy bunnies and unicorns. I’ll wait.

[Dum-dee-dum dum…]

All men now? Good.

Don’t worry, this isn’t about flowers, candy or cards. Of course the very idea is ridiculous. Valentine’s Day is an infidel holiday celebrating lewd, immoral and licentious behavior typical to your fallen religions. Trust me when I say we have nothing like Valentine’s Day in the one true religion of peace.

And men, isn’t it better for us that we don’t have it in our religion? No need to buy your wife flowers, candies or even a card on Valentine’s or any other day. This is just one small example of why the one true religion is better for men, and why you should seriously consider switching over while we’re still taking volunteers.

And it’s really easy to join. Just say one prayer, and you’re in for life.

Here’s another good reason to switch. Say you don’t feel like showing tender affection to your wife. You don’t have to! In fact, if she burns dinner, doesn’t clean the house, or pisses you off in any way you can just back-hand her, (as long as you don’t break any bones or mark her face.) In fact, it’s okay for you to give her a good thrashing now and then to get her back into line. Why? Because it says it’s okay in the holy books of the one true religion of peace, that’s why.

Don’t worry, the bruises covering the rest of her body won’t show, because (isn’t this great!) a wife can never leave the house while showing one square centimeter of bare uncovered skin that’s not between her eyes and her chin. Which is mighty handy, in case she’s still covered with bruises from her last few disciplinary sessions. And as long as you are careful not to beat her face in, she can still go out in public to do your shopping, (while properly attired, of course).

Here’s another reason why the one true religion is better for us men. Maybe your wife just doesn’t have the old sex-appeal any more. The thrill is gone. No problem! You can remarry, and bring a second, third or a fourth wife home. You don’t have to even ask the old bat’s permission. Whom you marry is up to you and you alone in the one true religion, because you are a man! If wife-number-one doesn’t want you bringing that pretty little thing home to your bed, well too bad for wife-number-one. She has no say in the matter. You may do what you want, because you are a man!

Now, my infidel friend and prospective member of the one true religion of peace, maybe you’re not such a handsome young stud yourself any more. You’re over forty, and you haven’t exactly been working out and keeping buff. Don’t worry, that’s not a problem. Let’s say your brother has a cute little daughter, Fatima. She’s going to be turning thirteen soon. For the first eleven or twelve years of her life she was allowed the run of the block like a free-spirited little sprite. Uncovered, just as cute as a button, and sure to be one hot number once she passes through puberty.

And as luck would have it, you also have a daughter of fourteen or so (perhaps from your second wife) who is not exactly getting any younger and you want her out of the house. Perhaps she is not as pretty as Fatima, but don’t worry, your brother is not as picky as you are. That’s right! You can trade your adolescent daughter to your brother, and he can reciprocate with Fatima. What a great deal this is for us men, under the rules of the one true religion of peace. In this way, you can keep a fresh stock of nubile teenage girls in your bed until you’re too old to want them any longer. And nobody can say a word against this excellent practice, because the prophet of the one true religion explicitly condones and encourages it as one of the very best ways to find a good wife. In fact, this is how the prophet found his favorite wife of all.

But what if your bubbly thirteen-year-old niece—excuse me—bride—objects to having sex with you, simply because you are forty-five and have a gray beard down to your big stomach? Ha-ha-ha! As if what she wants matters! Trust me, she has no say in the matter, none. If you and your brother like the idea of swapping teenage daughters for child brides, that’s all there is to it, it’s settled. (Some Western so-called scientists claim that all of this marrying of close relatives has caused so-called genetic problems, but what do they know? “Genetics” are not mentioned anywhere in our holy books, so they have no importance to members of the one true religion of peace.)

And if you like the girls really young, the one true religion is definitely for you. Even nine years old is plenty old enough for marriage and full marital relations. This was old enough for the Prophet and his very favorite young niece-bride, so don’t worry about catching any flak from other members of the one true religion. If a nine-year-old bride was old enough for the prophet (when he was in his fifties), it is old enough for any male member of the one true religion of peace.

But what if that hot new child bride is not in the mood to satisfy your male needs? Those teenagers (and preteens) can be quite a handful, as we all know. Well, she’d better get in the mood, if she doesn’t want a good thrashing! Our holy books are very clear on this. But what if she still won’t receive your overtures when you want to lay a little loving on her? You have even beaten her black and blue (except on her face), but to no avail. She’s lost that loving feeling, or maybe she never had it in the first place. Some teenage brides are just like that.

Men, this part is great, you will just love it. And this goes for any of your wives, from your oldest to your youngest. Just divorce them, by saying “I divorce thee!” That’s it! No lawyers, no paperwork, no alimony. After this legally-binding divorce occurs she’s thrown out on the street, penniless and rejected by society. The witch will soon be begging on a corner. She’s not exactly a pretty sight, but lucky for us men we don’t have to see her, since she’s just a lump in a burqa, squatting on the sidewalk with only her begging cup showing. Her pitiful example will also do wonders to encourage your other wives to please you better.

Isn’t that great, men? Truly, the one true religion of peace is perfect for us.

(the rest at the FR thread link.)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2680399/posts


8 posted on 04/20/2011 12:56:36 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

As far as I’m concerned, men who seriously threaten women with death or who kill women simply for failing to display grossly public signs of subjugation to men, are no more than vermin that need to be removed from the gene pool post-haste.

Yet where are the protests of the radical feminists against the subjugation of women by Islam? Only one that I know of, the late Andrea Dworkin (whom I otherwise strongly disagree with on most matters), called Islam out on this, and was ostracized by her “sisters”. In this case, Dworkin was right.


9 posted on 04/20/2011 1:32:35 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (All Hail the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
As far as I’m concerned, men who seriously threaten women with death or who kill women simply for failing to display grossly public signs of subjugation to men, are no more than vermin that need to be removed from the gene pool post-haste. There is no reforming them and there is no place for them on God’s earth.

These men obviously have deep feelings of inferiority, and for that matter, they are inferior. Their only self-redemption is putting full faith in the anti-Christ, Mohammed. How they can believe in a religion that is so evil and teaches against common sense is a mystery to many of us.

10 posted on 04/20/2011 1:44:02 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (I retain the right to be inconsistent, contradictory and even flat-out wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Radical Islam has found a new recruiting ground here in the United States, under the guise as beiong a response to the spread of radical feminism. One website that is on the surface anti-feminist has gone in this direction, preceeded by its anti-semitic tendencies. The site administrator has even gone as far as calling Imanutjob a “real man”. The discussion topics for Islam are far more numerous than those for Christianity.
And it’s not the Save the Males website. While that site goes into anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, Makow has not gone over to the Moon God Death Cult - yet.


11 posted on 04/20/2011 1:51:17 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (All Hail the No Talent Pop Star pResident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

hijab = burial shroud


12 posted on 04/20/2011 1:51:32 PM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson