Skip to comments.Associated Press Involved In New Obama Birth Certificate Forgery !?
Posted on 04/27/2011 2:53:10 PM PDT by RobinMasters
This is getting good... Just when they thought the "release" would put the issue to rest. Let us see if the mainstream media continues the coverup... Below reports from Market Ticker, Drudge Report and The Smoking Gun web site...
Via Market Ticker: Oh C'mon #2 - AP Is Involved?
The AP has also released a "different version" of the document the White House released. [White House Version Embedded Below, Note The Gap Between Date Stamp And "Date Stamped"]
Guys, this is too freaking blatant.
Incidentally, the AP's version was flattened before being PDF'd. Too bad they forgot to do that on the *****house, er, Whitehouse copy.
Heh AP - betcha you won't look at this!
Here's the AP's document snippet on the accepted date:
And now let's have the Whitehouse version:
Look closely at the date stamp. They're not aligned at the top. The error is small, but it's there. Also note the saturation problems in the Whitehouse version in the word "Date" and the fill on the "A".
The mystery deepens, but the evidence is even more damning than it was before: This "document" was tampered with.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Download the PDF Report here
The Jerome Corsi's forthcoming book Where's the Birth Certificate ?" : WheresTheBirthCertificate.com
Video (Oct 10, 2008) : Obama Citizenship - October Surprise
Different saturation levels on different copies.
Birthers could have a birth canal video of the actual event and still not buy it.
right, i believe the whitehouse asked for a few copies, then they distributed the copies of the copies to the press.
I'm telling you they're losing their touch over at Langley. They used to be able to do stuff that'd make your hair stand on end.
libs and apologists could have his placenta in a Kenyan pickle jar and not think “that part” of the Constitution really mattered anyway
It doesn’t even matter if there is anything there.
The document Urkel released shows what we have all known for years - Urkel is ineligible for the presidency because his father was not an American citizen therefor he cannot be a Natural Born Citizen.
Here’s a question I haven’t seen asked: If this is such a huge screw-up on the WH’s part, then why haven’t they “flattened” the image on their website yet?
The list, ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
I noticed the artifacts in my post this morning.
Zoom in by 5x. They jump out. It’s all messed up.
Interesting you’d want to buy anything from this president.
The point is not “where” Urkel was born but to whom. If to BO sr. then he cannot be a Natural Born Citizen or a legitimate president. He has proven his ineligibility.
This is probably why he did not what the document released all these years.
How come there is no boarder on the BC. I looked at my family’s this morning and they all have boarders.
Who would ever believe any story with an AP byline? Not me.
Tell Pissant I said hello.
What part of “Dad was not a US citizen” do you not understand?
LOL, so true!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.