Sorry LJ, I got my videos mixed up, but I have to say the Mr Winston is being quite unforgiving. There is no question that the new BC is a phony. But point taken on my theory, and still i think my theory is valid just on a different point. THE BC IS FAKE so someone needs to come forward.
Some people on FR - quite a few, lately - seem to have as their sole interest “debunking” anyone who gives some evidecence that this new and improved abstract is a forgery.
If you get my drift...
Please pardon me if I've been in any way unforgiving.
Personally though, before I post something, I try and verify whether it's actually true. In this case, that would've been very easy to do.
The reason for this is that I value the truth.
As far as there being no question that the new BC is a phony, the reality is that, so far, I've been unable to find any compelling evidence that it is. And believe me, it hasn't been for lack of trying. If you want some detailed and honest analysis, just review my posting history.
By “unforgiving” you must mean that he’s not cutting anyone any slack on their sloppy arguments, because from where I’m sitting it looks like he’s being *quite* patient in putting up with the conspiracy buffs’ temper tantrums.