Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigative book about "Babygate", Sarah Palin's faked pregnancy with Trig, about to be published
PoliticalGates ^ | 05/16/2011 | Patrick

Posted on 05/16/2011 11:53:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last
Folks, With this piece of information, I am now most certain that the Media and their ilk REALLY FEAR Sarah Palin and don't want her in Politics IN ANY CAPACITY ( much less to run for President ).

From planting a stalker to rent the house next to hers to hounding her husband and daughter, I thought they could go no lower.... I was wrong.

BTW, the site : Business Insider gave this piece of trash article a lot of publicity if you go to their website today.

1 posted on 05/16/2011 11:53:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Actually the article is getting too much publicity HERE. What a bunch of caca!


2 posted on 05/16/2011 11:55:10 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The very fact that state-run media obsesses over Sarah Palin tells you who they fear.

You gotta ask yourself: "Why are they so afraid of her?"

The answer, of course, is because they know that she is eminently electable, and that her election would mark the beginning of the end of their authoritarian-socialist dreams.

ineluctable

3 posted on 05/16/2011 11:55:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What’s with these wacky birthers anyway?


4 posted on 05/16/2011 11:56:19 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

Oh, but it’s okay when THEY do it.


5 posted on 05/16/2011 12:02:46 PM PDT by MeganC (NO WAR FOR OIL! ........except when a Democrat's in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How long has Politicalgate been around?

I take it this is another venemous conservative-hating site, as if there weren’t enough already.

This is the outfit that has been trying hard to demonize Sarah the last few days by using manipulated polls.


6 posted on 05/16/2011 12:03:01 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Well, you have admit they have a point.

Most children born with Down’s syndrome are born to teenage mothers. Women having children later in life almost never have a child with Down’s syndrome.

(just one more sarcastic log of reality to throw on the fire of this absolute nonsense.)

7 posted on 05/16/2011 12:03:23 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is there a more disgusting POS than Steve Schmidt?


8 posted on 05/16/2011 12:03:53 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Okay, this takes the cake!!! First of all, Sarah Palin has been investigated more than any other candidate in history and we are supposed to believe that she hid something this HUGE the whole time??

And why would she take the “blame” from Bristol only to have it out in the open that Bristol had a child 9 months later???

And how exactly was Bristol supposedly giving birth while pregnant with another child??

And lastly, how often does an 18 year old give birth to a Down’s Syndrom child?


9 posted on 05/16/2011 12:04:15 PM PDT by mrsadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Wow... just wow.


10 posted on 05/16/2011 12:04:33 PM PDT by hattend (Obama is better than OJ... He found a killer while on the golf course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Strange, they don’t provide any photos of Kristol Palin at the same time as her mother.


11 posted on 05/16/2011 12:04:47 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Surely no one with an ounce of brain matter in their head would believe that kind of nonsense. (Not that there aren’t plenty of libs who don’t even have an ounce of brain matter.)


12 posted on 05/16/2011 12:05:02 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The idea that Sarah faked a pregnancy with Trig is ridiculous. It is well know that she was too busy hiding her role as the mastermind of the 911 attacks as well as planning for Tuscon.
13 posted on 05/16/2011 12:06:38 PM PDT by JPG (The real reason? Huck is deathly afraid of grizzly bears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend

RE: Wow... just wow.

There’s a simple solution to this so called problem -— DNA Test.


14 posted on 05/16/2011 12:06:46 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This particular assault proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the Left’s greatest fear is truth, honesty, conviction, morals, and a vision beyond their capability. Armed thusly Sarah Palin is their worst enemy.

They fear her as they fear nothing else in this World, and THAT is why they are throwing every scrap of dung they can muster at her. Trying to bury her in excrement of their own manufacture.

Sarah Palin will do the right thing for the country, for herself, her family, and we’ll find out what she decides in the near future.


15 posted on 05/16/2011 12:08:44 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

>>Their articles will surely come back to haunt them.<<

The truest words in the article.


16 posted on 05/16/2011 12:11:16 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No! Palin doesn’t have to now down to nutty PDSers, she had to prove nothing to no one! In fact there is a video of a guy interviewing Sarah in early 2008
And one could clearly tell that she was pregnant, fat face and heavy breathing


17 posted on 05/16/2011 12:11:39 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Sarah Palin was wearing a support for her belly. Why would she do that? Because she was pregnant. Duh.


18 posted on 05/16/2011 12:12:34 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Obama can't see something pure like the truth without wanting to abort it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; MestaMachine; onyx
WOW! Sorry folks this is too much! This really makes me angry!!!!

Sarah terrifies them, because her very presents exposes who they are, They don't like the Idea of "Lesser" people being brought into the world without their say so. So they revert back to their Eugenic, Muckraking, Fascist roots.

19 posted on 05/16/2011 12:13:28 PM PDT by KC_Lion (America IS at War with itself, and no one seems to notice or care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

One witness did see the live birth at a grassy knoll.


20 posted on 05/16/2011 12:14:08 PM PDT by Augustinian monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

What they did is that they decided to publish all of their online “work” (and I use the scare quotes advisably) as an “investigative” piece of fundraising.

Palingates, the origninal Palin conspiracy site, had a falling out, as thieves often do, over money. It split off into a smaller group, called “Politicalgates”. I believe it’s this smaller group that is publishing the book, which is a collection of the online stuff.

It’s a fundraising scam. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Best,

Chris


21 posted on 05/16/2011 12:16:29 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"There’s a simple solution to this so called problem -— ".

...common sense and decency.

22 posted on 05/16/2011 12:18:15 PM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mrsadams
v

This is from Wikipedia, but it falls squarely in line with everything I've read on the subject previously *& is fully footnoted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome

Maternal age influences the chances of conceiving a baby with Down syndrome. At maternal age 20 to 24, the probability is one in 1562; at age 35 to 39 the probability is one in 214, and above age 45 the probability is one in 19.[89] Although the probability increases with maternal age, 80% of children with Down syndrome are born to women under the age of 35,[90] reflecting the overall fertility of that age group. Recent data also suggest that paternal age, especially beyond 42,[91] also increases the risk of Down syndrome manifesting.

So: The individual's chances are much greater when the woman is over 35, going up every year, but most Down Syndrome babies are born to young women because the vast majority of all babies are born to younger women.

P.S. It's called Down Syndrome in the United States, Down's in England. National Down Syndrome Society: http://www.ndss.org/

23 posted on 05/16/2011 12:18:45 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

They don’t want to admit to the real problems in America, so the easiest alternative is to go after Palin. Yeah, I’m a lot more interested in knowing what our president’s plans are than to care about someone who might possibly not even run for president.


24 posted on 05/16/2011 12:19:46 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: section9

>>It’s a fundraising scam. Nothing more. Nothing less.<<

And I think it is gonna cost them big time, both in money and credibility.


25 posted on 05/16/2011 12:22:31 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name
Oh, yes!

And women always gain a huge amount of weight with every pregnancy. They have to be big as houses, instead of 20 lbs. heavier. And they always have to carry it all out in front.

(another sarcastic log for the reality fire)

26 posted on 05/16/2011 12:23:14 PM PDT by TheWriterTX (Buy Ammo Often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The pending publication of such a book comes as no surprise to us, as anyone who questions Sarah Palin's account of "babygate" in an unbiased way and with an open mind will quickly realize that the pregnancy was faked.

So they want Trig's Birth Certificate, but expect us to swallow the vacuous fabrication or DuhWon without question?

I'm convinced these liberals are on halucinogenics.

I guess we can call them "Trig-ers"...

27 posted on 05/16/2011 12:24:37 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My sister got away with no one know she was pregnant until nearly 7 months, and she only weighs just under 100 lbs. Everyone carries babies differently. Lots of times, boy will carry deeper into the stomach cavity causing the rear end to spread and girls will flop forward. Same sister, pregnant with girl 2 years later, same weight at start of pregnancy... looked 5 months pregnant at 3 months.

Stupid stupid “journalists.”

Oh, and the one of her “three weeks before giving birth”, she is leaning over, causing her tummy to shift inward.

Idiots.


28 posted on 05/16/2011 12:24:37 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have never in my life seen anything like the democrat party’s character assassination of Sarah Louise Palin and her innocent children.


29 posted on 05/16/2011 12:24:52 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I knew a woman that was 9 months pregnant and no one knew it(except her and her husband)until she actually gave birth. She hardly showed at all. As for the one picture in the article, Sarah is obviously heavier than normal. Why is that if she is not pregnant and why fake a pregnancy in the first place. The biggest fact against this obviously lying article is the fact that Trig is a downs child. Women who are over 40 are many times more likely to have a downs syndrome child than a teenager.

The left fears Sarah greatly and are still trying to knock her down.

30 posted on 05/16/2011 12:26:17 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So where did Trig come from, then? Did a STORK deliver him?


31 posted on 05/16/2011 12:27:22 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This is what CRAZY looks like.

This is how desperate, kooky, conspiracy minded, weave fools gold out of straw, wacko, idiots look to anyone not initiated into the deeper mysteries of Kookville (Truthers, Birthers, Deathers, and TrigPreggers one and all).

32 posted on 05/16/2011 12:28:51 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Like, O-M-G! There's just no way that a woman could have a small belly when she was that pregnant. It just can't be!
Everybody knows that all women blow up like carnival balloons when they're pregnant.
And everybody knows that there aren't any clothes that help to reduce the appearance of a baby bump.

/sarcasm (just in case)

33 posted on 05/16/2011 12:29:55 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Lots of times, boy will carry deeper into the stomach cavity causing the rear end to spread and girls will flop forward. Same sister, pregnant with girl 2 years later, same weight at start of pregnancy... looked 5 months pregnant at 3 months.

"Basketball" (girl) vs. "Football" (boy). In the days before ultrasound pics, this was the accepted guessing method...

34 posted on 05/16/2011 12:30:28 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JPG

Exactly!

These people need to get their conspiracies straight...


35 posted on 05/16/2011 12:31:58 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Augustinian monk

No, no, no. The grassy knoll was where the SECOND obstetrician was standing.

The first obstetrician was in that book suppository place....


36 posted on 05/16/2011 12:35:42 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just in time to compete with the Corsi book on Obama. Coincidence?


37 posted on 05/16/2011 12:38:25 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

These people were actually thrown under the bus by polite liberals because they are embarrasingly crazy.

But there’s a cohort of lefties who have money who are willing to spend it on crap like this. That’s what Politicalgates is after.

Best,

Chris


38 posted on 05/16/2011 12:38:31 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It strikes me that if there is never a clear, contemporaneous public record of what transpired with Trig's birth...

Yeah, about that... You see, MOST people don't provide a "contemporaneous public record of what transpired" at their child's birth. In fact, MOST people wopuld find it odd if anyone DID provide "contemporaneous public record of what transpired" at their child's birth.

39 posted on 05/16/2011 12:38:44 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“BTW, the site : Business Insider gave this piece of trash article a lot of publicity if you go to their website today.”

Odd that you post articles from “The Business Insider” on a daily basis.


40 posted on 05/16/2011 12:42:23 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This nonsense is born of a hatred and fear of Sarah Palin by the communist left. She is a Christian who 'walks the walk', a proud mother of 5, a woman happy in her marriage and comfortable in her own skin, a political conservative and popular with most Americans, Sarah Palin is the antithesis of everything the left embraces. So, they attack her her family and her honesty, two of Sarah Palin's most valuable assets. If the vicious leftists can put into question Palin's honesty by claiming that she lied about Trig's 'real' mother to 'protect' her under-age daughter, Bristol, who, according to the left's conspiracy theory allegedly was impregnated by her father, Sarah Palin's husband, Tod. How sick can they get? The vile claim is easily refuted and PhotoShopped pictures cannot compete with facts. Trig represents Sarah Palin's personal rejection of abortion and the left cannot abide that. Not in a woman who could be president of the United States. They may not even believe the 'Trig-is-Bristol's child' lie, but they know that if they can repeat it often enough, they can probably gain some traction with it and, they hope, force Sarah Palin on the defensive, where they want her, and undermine her credibility. After all, they;'ll say, "if she would lie about the baby then she would lie about anything. ergo, "Sarah Palin is a liar and cannot be trusted". That the real lie is the one that claims Trig Palin is 'actually' Bristol's child doesn't matter. Not if Palin's credibility can be incessantly questioned, as it will be if she runs for the GOP nomination for president in 2012.

suspect that the left blogospher is willing to risk some repulsion from sane people in order to undermine Sarah Palin and, no doubt with the hope that they can discourage her from running for president, because they must truly fear this woman. Meanwhile, we get lukewarm presidential wannabes (like Gingrich and Pawlenty) that the MSM laughably term 'front-runners' for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination while the hard-left clearly shows us that Sarah Palin is the only Republican they really fear. I truly hope and pray that Sarah runs. Watching the left go absolutely bonkers as she mows down the 'opposition' and, in the process, produces an easily verifiable birth certificate for Trig - which they'll instantly declare to be fraudulent, further distancing them from mainstream America while generating sympathy for Palin and negating some of the unfortunate female voter apathy for a woman presidential candidate.

41 posted on 05/16/2011 12:49:08 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

The loons claim that she faked the pregnancy to cover for Bristol (who they say is Trig’s real mother) and I guess she was supposed to have gotten pregnant a few weeks later too?

Anyway, if this were flipping true, don’t you think Bristol’s ex-loser would have non-stop blabbed it?


42 posted on 05/16/2011 12:57:48 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

I gave up on book suppositories...too painful.


43 posted on 05/16/2011 1:01:06 PM PDT by JPG (The real reason? Huck is deathly afraid of grizzly bears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

“Most children born with Down’s syndrome are born to teenage mothers. Women having children later in life almost never have a child with Down’s syndrome.”

As a parent of a DS kid, we were told the exact opposite. Why do you think expecting mothers over 35 are screened for carrying DS kids? I don’t think you are correct.


44 posted on 05/16/2011 1:02:20 PM PDT by gavjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Please tell me when any politican were required to produce the birth certificate of their child? And by not doing that it means their child isn’t theirs? These people are truly pathetic and insane.


45 posted on 05/16/2011 1:02:50 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gavjoe

Note the sarcasm disclaimer at the end of their post.


46 posted on 05/16/2011 1:04:19 PM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gavjoe

I think that was sarcasm...


47 posted on 05/16/2011 1:04:53 PM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Gee, what will become of the one-world socialist/marxist/elitist movement if Sarah Palin becomes president? Answer: dead in the USA! Soros, Strong et al will have pissed away billions of their stolen loot.
48 posted on 05/16/2011 1:05:30 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gavjoe

I agree with you. It is the exact opposite. As a woman grows older her chance of having a downs syndrome child increases.


49 posted on 05/16/2011 1:06:52 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gavjoe

“(just one more sarcastic log of reality to throw on the fire of this absolute nonsense.)”

Sorry, if I were more computer literate I would have put the word “sarcastic” in bold and italics in my previous message. And exactly what you were told is exactly the point I was trying to make.


50 posted on 05/16/2011 1:08:20 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson