You gotta ask yourself: "Why are they so afraid of her?"
The answer, of course, is because they know that she is eminently electable, and that her election would mark the beginning of the end of their authoritarian-socialist dreams.
Posted on 05/16/2011 11:53:09 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
From planting a stalker to rent the house next to hers to hounding her husband and daughter, I thought they could go no lower.... I was wrong.
BTW, the site : Business Insider gave this piece of trash article a lot of publicity if you go to their website today.
Actually the article is getting too much publicity HERE. What a bunch of caca!
You gotta ask yourself: "Why are they so afraid of her?"
The answer, of course, is because they know that she is eminently electable, and that her election would mark the beginning of the end of their authoritarian-socialist dreams.
What’s with these wacky birthers anyway?
Oh, but it’s okay when THEY do it.
How long has Politicalgate been around?
I take it this is another venemous conservative-hating site, as if there weren’t enough already.
This is the outfit that has been trying hard to demonize Sarah the last few days by using manipulated polls.
Most children born with Down’s syndrome are born to teenage mothers. Women having children later in life almost never have a child with Down’s syndrome.
(just one more sarcastic log of reality to throw on the fire of this absolute nonsense.)
Is there a more disgusting POS than Steve Schmidt?
Okay, this takes the cake!!! First of all, Sarah Palin has been investigated more than any other candidate in history and we are supposed to believe that she hid something this HUGE the whole time??
And why would she take the “blame” from Bristol only to have it out in the open that Bristol had a child 9 months later???
And how exactly was Bristol supposedly giving birth while pregnant with another child??
And lastly, how often does an 18 year old give birth to a Down’s Syndrom child?
Wow... just wow.
Strange, they don’t provide any photos of Kristol Palin at the same time as her mother.
Surely no one with an ounce of brain matter in their head would believe that kind of nonsense. (Not that there aren’t plenty of libs who don’t even have an ounce of brain matter.)
RE: Wow... just wow.
There’s a simple solution to this so called problem -— DNA Test.
This particular assault proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the Left’s greatest fear is truth, honesty, conviction, morals, and a vision beyond their capability. Armed thusly Sarah Palin is their worst enemy.
They fear her as they fear nothing else in this World, and THAT is why they are throwing every scrap of dung they can muster at her. Trying to bury her in excrement of their own manufacture.
Sarah Palin will do the right thing for the country, for herself, her family, and we’ll find out what she decides in the near future.
>>Their articles will surely come back to haunt them.<<
The truest words in the article.
No! Palin doesn’t have to now down to nutty PDSers, she had to prove nothing to no one! In fact there is a video of a guy interviewing Sarah in early 2008
And one could clearly tell that she was pregnant, fat face and heavy breathing
Sarah terrifies them, because her very presents exposes who they are, They don't like the Idea of "Lesser" people being brought into the world without their say so. So they revert back to their Eugenic, Muckraking, Fascist roots.
One witness did see the live birth at a grassy knoll.
What they did is that they decided to publish all of their online “work” (and I use the scare quotes advisably) as an “investigative” piece of fundraising.
Palingates, the origninal Palin conspiracy site, had a falling out, as thieves often do, over money. It split off into a smaller group, called “Politicalgates”. I believe it’s this smaller group that is publishing the book, which is a collection of the online stuff.
It’s a fundraising scam. Nothing more. Nothing less.
Best,
Chris
...common sense and decency.
This is from Wikipedia, but it falls squarely in line with everything I've read on the subject previously *& is fully footnoted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome
Maternal age influences the chances of conceiving a baby with Down syndrome. At maternal age 20 to 24, the probability is one in 1562; at age 35 to 39 the probability is one in 214, and above age 45 the probability is one in 19.[89] Although the probability increases with maternal age, 80% of children with Down syndrome are born to women under the age of 35,[90] reflecting the overall fertility of that age group. Recent data also suggest that paternal age, especially beyond 42,[91] also increases the risk of Down syndrome manifesting.
So: The individual's chances are much greater when the woman is over 35, going up every year, but most Down Syndrome babies are born to young women because the vast majority of all babies are born to younger women.
P.S. It's called Down Syndrome in the United States, Down's in England. National Down Syndrome Society: http://www.ndss.org/
They don’t want to admit to the real problems in America, so the easiest alternative is to go after Palin. Yeah, I’m a lot more interested in knowing what our president’s plans are than to care about someone who might possibly not even run for president.
>>It’s a fundraising scam. Nothing more. Nothing less.<<
And I think it is gonna cost them big time, both in money and credibility.
And women always gain a huge amount of weight with every pregnancy. They have to be big as houses, instead of 20 lbs. heavier. And they always have to carry it all out in front.
(another sarcastic log for the reality fire)
So they want Trig's Birth Certificate, but expect us to swallow the vacuous fabrication or DuhWon without question?
I'm convinced these liberals are on halucinogenics.
I guess we can call them "Trig-ers"...
My sister got away with no one know she was pregnant until nearly 7 months, and she only weighs just under 100 lbs. Everyone carries babies differently. Lots of times, boy will carry deeper into the stomach cavity causing the rear end to spread and girls will flop forward. Same sister, pregnant with girl 2 years later, same weight at start of pregnancy... looked 5 months pregnant at 3 months.
Stupid stupid “journalists.”
Oh, and the one of her “three weeks before giving birth”, she is leaning over, causing her tummy to shift inward.
Idiots.
I have never in my life seen anything like the democrat party’s character assassination of Sarah Louise Palin and her innocent children.
The left fears Sarah greatly and are still trying to knock her down.
So where did Trig come from, then? Did a STORK deliver him?
This is how desperate, kooky, conspiracy minded, weave fools gold out of straw, wacko, idiots look to anyone not initiated into the deeper mysteries of Kookville (Truthers, Birthers, Deathers, and TrigPreggers one and all).
/sarcasm (just in case)
"Basketball" (girl) vs. "Football" (boy). In the days before ultrasound pics, this was the accepted guessing method...
Exactly!
These people need to get their conspiracies straight...
No, no, no. The grassy knoll was where the SECOND obstetrician was standing.
The first obstetrician was in that book suppository place....
Just in time to compete with the Corsi book on Obama. Coincidence?
These people were actually thrown under the bus by polite liberals because they are embarrasingly crazy.
But there’s a cohort of lefties who have money who are willing to spend it on crap like this. That’s what Politicalgates is after.
Best,
Chris
Yeah, about that... You see, MOST people don't provide a "contemporaneous public record of what transpired" at their child's birth. In fact, MOST people wopuld find it odd if anyone DID provide "contemporaneous public record of what transpired" at their child's birth.
“BTW, the site : Business Insider gave this piece of trash article a lot of publicity if you go to their website today.”
Odd that you post articles from “The Business Insider” on a daily basis.
suspect that the left blogospher is willing to risk some repulsion from sane people in order to undermine Sarah Palin and, no doubt with the hope that they can discourage her from running for president, because they must truly fear this woman. Meanwhile, we get lukewarm presidential wannabes (like Gingrich and Pawlenty) that the MSM laughably term 'front-runners' for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination while the hard-left clearly shows us that Sarah Palin is the only Republican they really fear. I truly hope and pray that Sarah runs. Watching the left go absolutely bonkers as she mows down the 'opposition' and, in the process, produces an easily verifiable birth certificate for Trig - which they'll instantly declare to be fraudulent, further distancing them from mainstream America while generating sympathy for Palin and negating some of the unfortunate female voter apathy for a woman presidential candidate.
The loons claim that she faked the pregnancy to cover for Bristol (who they say is Trig’s real mother) and I guess she was supposed to have gotten pregnant a few weeks later too?
Anyway, if this were flipping true, don’t you think Bristol’s ex-loser would have non-stop blabbed it?
I gave up on book suppositories...too painful.
“Most children born with Down’s syndrome are born to teenage mothers. Women having children later in life almost never have a child with Down’s syndrome.”
As a parent of a DS kid, we were told the exact opposite. Why do you think expecting mothers over 35 are screened for carrying DS kids? I don’t think you are correct.
Please tell me when any politican were required to produce the birth certificate of their child? And by not doing that it means their child isn’t theirs? These people are truly pathetic and insane.
Note the sarcasm disclaimer at the end of their post.
I think that was sarcasm...
I agree with you. It is the exact opposite. As a woman grows older her chance of having a downs syndrome child increases.
“(just one more sarcastic log of reality to throw on the fire of this absolute nonsense.)”
Sorry, if I were more computer literate I would have put the word “sarcastic” in bold and italics in my previous message. And exactly what you were told is exactly the point I was trying to make.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.